Re: Where have svt-av1 1.8.0-2 gone?
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:06:31 +0900 Takashi Yano wrote: > On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:49:30 + > Jon Turney wrote: > > On 16/03/2024 00:48, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:39:33 +0900 > > > Takashi Yano wrote: > > [...] > > >> > > >> This expected: > > >> 1.8.0-1 -> 1.8.0-2 -> 2.0.0-1 > > >> libsvtav1(1.8.0-1) -> libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2) > > >> -> libsvt1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(2.0.0-2) > > >> > > >> However, this does not seem to work as I expected. > > > > What unexpected thing happens? > > > > I guess you only get one of libsvtav1enc1 or libsvtav1dec0 (since if > > these both are marked "obsoletes: libsvtav1", to the dependency solver > > that mean that either of can replace libsvtav1, and provides everything > > that it provides. > > > > So maybe the best solution is: > > > > libsvtav1dec0_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 > > libsvtav1dec0_REQUIRES=libsvtav1enc1 > > > > So libsvtav1 is replaced by both libsvtav1dec0 and libsvtav1enc1 > > Looks great! > > > >> My expectation was that both libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) and > > >> libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2) > > >> are installed for upgrading libsvtav1(1.8.0-1). > > >> > > >> Instead, I found > > >> > > >> 1.8.0-2: > > >> libsvtav1_CATEGORY="_obsolete" > > >> libsvtav1_REQUIRES="libsvtav1enc1 libsvtav1dec0" > > >> libsvtav1enc1_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Enc-1.dll" > > >> libsvtav1dec0_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll" > > > > Yeah, this should work, but is not longer preferred because you end up > > with an empty libsvtav1 hanging around forever... > > > > >> works as expected. > > >> Is it possible to change it like this now? > > > > I've tweaked the existing dependencies based on my reasoning above. > > Please let me know if this still isn't working right. > > Thanks you very much! > > Could you please also remove: > libsvtav1enc1_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 > because it seems that this conflicts with > libsvtav1dec0_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 > ? I noticed that the following happen even with obove if the package which requires libsvtav1 is installed. At the first upgrade, Uninstall libsvt1v1 1.8.0-1 Install libsvtav1dec0 1.8.0-2 Install libsvtav1enc1 1.8.0-2 that is as expected except for libsvtav1dec0 is not latest. However, at the next upgrade (just run setup again), Uninstall libsvtav1dec0 1.8.0-2 Install libsvtav1 1.8.0-1 Install libsvtav1dec0 2.0.0-1 happens. This causes conflict: $ cygcheck -f /usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll libsvtav1-1.8.0-1 libsvtav1dec0-2.0.0-1 Im not sure why this happens. Contrary to your idea, libsvtav1enc1_OBSOLETES="libsvtav1" libsvtav1enc1_REQUIRES="libsvtav1dec0" the followings happen as expected. Uninstall libsvtav1 1.8.0-1 Install libsvtav1dec0 2.0.0-1 Install libsvtav1enc1 1.8.0-2 Of cource, libsvtav1dec0_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 should be removed in this case. What do you think? -- Takashi Yano
Re: Where have svt-av1 1.8.0-2 gone?
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:49:30 + Jon Turney wrote: > On 16/03/2024 00:48, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:39:33 +0900 > > Takashi Yano wrote: > [...] > >> > >> This expected: > >> 1.8.0-1 -> 1.8.0-2 -> 2.0.0-1 > >> libsvtav1(1.8.0-1) -> libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2) > >>-> libsvt1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(2.0.0-2) > >> > >> However, this does not seem to work as I expected. > > What unexpected thing happens? > > I guess you only get one of libsvtav1enc1 or libsvtav1dec0 (since if > these both are marked "obsoletes: libsvtav1", to the dependency solver > that mean that either of can replace libsvtav1, and provides everything > that it provides. > > So maybe the best solution is: > > libsvtav1dec0_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 > libsvtav1dec0_REQUIRES=libsvtav1enc1 > > So libsvtav1 is replaced by both libsvtav1dec0 and libsvtav1enc1 Looks great! > >> My expectation was that both libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) and > >> libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2) > >> are installed for upgrading libsvtav1(1.8.0-1). > >> > >> Instead, I found > >> > >> 1.8.0-2: > >> libsvtav1_CATEGORY="_obsolete" > >> libsvtav1_REQUIRES="libsvtav1enc1 libsvtav1dec0" > >> libsvtav1enc1_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Enc-1.dll" > >> libsvtav1dec0_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll" > > Yeah, this should work, but is not longer preferred because you end up > with an empty libsvtav1 hanging around forever... > > >> works as expected. > >> Is it possible to change it like this now? > > I've tweaked the existing dependencies based on my reasoning above. > Please let me know if this still isn't working right. Thanks you very much! Could you please also remove: libsvtav1enc1_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 because it seems that this conflicts with libsvtav1dec0_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 ? -- Takashi Yano
Re: Where have svt-av1 1.8.0-2 gone?
On 16/03/2024 00:48, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:39:33 +0900 Takashi Yano wrote: [...] This expected: 1.8.0-1 -> 1.8.0-2 -> 2.0.0-1 libsvtav1(1.8.0-1) -> libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2) -> libsvt1enc1(1.8.0-2) + libsvtav1dec0(2.0.0-2) However, this does not seem to work as I expected. What unexpected thing happens? I guess you only get one of libsvtav1enc1 or libsvtav1dec0 (since if these both are marked "obsoletes: libsvtav1", to the dependency solver that mean that either of can replace libsvtav1, and provides everything that it provides. So maybe the best solution is: libsvtav1dec0_OBSOLETES=libsvtav1 libsvtav1dec0_REQUIRES=libsvtav1enc1 So libsvtav1 is replaced by both libsvtav1dec0 and libsvtav1enc1 My expectation was that both libsvtav1enc1(1.8.0-2) and libsvtav1dec0(1.8.0-2) are installed for upgrading libsvtav1(1.8.0-1). Instead, I found 1.8.0-2: libsvtav1_CATEGORY="_obsolete" libsvtav1_REQUIRES="libsvtav1enc1 libsvtav1dec0" libsvtav1enc1_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Enc-1.dll" libsvtav1dec0_CONTENTS="usr/bin/cygSvtAv1Dec-0.dll" Yeah, this should work, but is not longer preferred because you end up with an empty libsvtav1 hanging around forever... works as expected. Is it possible to change it like this now? I've tweaked the existing dependencies based on my reasoning above. Please let me know if this still isn't working right.
Re: [ITP] mandoc 1.14.6-1
On 11/03/2024 19:06, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: I would like to contribute mandoc. Also present in Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu, ... and as the default man page formatter on *BSD. Useful to check man pages for compatibility with *BSD systems. GTG diff --git a/cygwin-pkg-maint b/cygwin-pkg-maint .. +mandoc Christian Franke
