Name: Christian Kellermann
Package: chicken
BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY
Comment: 5012-bit RSA, converted by ckellerm@devpool08 from OpenSSH
B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAACcwykoG217tPyg4XiJl1Aar2q//xTCFukpgQKC2UW4Z
gq++bvwh5TNioceh3UEbFZkgzZ3IXiAhYStb/1sTAmytU2AQv+uaCvZMV5u7tnBc5kATxX
* Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com [150110 11:00]:
Christian,
any problem with the instructions ?
Sorry, none. It seemed that my initial mail for the SSH key has
been lost. I have uploaded the packages as stated in the instructions
and added my mail in the !email file.
I hope all goes well.
* Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com [141211 17:31]:
Please test the attachments and let me know, so I will
build for you the final x86_64 package
Thanks, the attached files are OK.
Now how shall I proceed?
Thanks,
Christian
--
May you be peaceful, may you live in safety, may you be free
Hi All!
Based on the feedback of Marco and Corinna, I propose the following
cygport file for the chicken upgrade:
# package name
NAME=chicken
VERSION=4.9.0.1
RELEASE=1
# setup.hint generation
CATEGORY=interpreters
SUMMARY=A practical and portable scheme system.
DESCRIPTION=A practical and
* Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com [141211 11:14]:
This is default behaviour so you should be able to do without the
src_install function.
Ok!
I need to update an internal database of available chicken modules.
However due to the internal design, I need to call this either so
* Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com [141211 13:30]:
If you don't use any of the automatisms and special features described
in the cygport manual's postinstall section, I guess you either have
to install the script in your install rule, or you have to install it
manually from the
Dear List,
I am a core developer of the CHICKEN scheme system. We have supported
building and running CHICKEN on cygwin for almost a decade now. However
I noticed that the current cygwin package has been outdated for years.
The current version that's listed is 3.4.0-0 which has been discontinued
* Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com [141210 13:28]:
As I only have access to a 32bit Windows Version (7) atm I am unable to
test this for 64-bit builds.
Compiling chicken-4.9.0.1-1.x86_64
make -f ./Makefile.cygwin CONFIG= all
make[1]: Entering directory
* Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com [141210 13:31]:
The problem is just this: We need a maintainer for the package.
Somebody who's willing to do the packaging, manage updates, and
monitors the cygwin mailing list for user's problems.
Are you willing to take over Cygwin
* Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com [141210 14:58]:
Thanks I will have a look. What's the cygwin way of detecting whether
we build for 32 or 64 bit? I'd use that to switch options then.
${ARCH} is i686 or x86_64. Or you can test like this:
if defined ARCH_i686
then
* Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com [141210 15:45]:
CHICKEN_ARCH=x68-64
^^^
this looks wrong.
Oops, thanks. Consider it fixed.
Kind regards,
Christian
--
May you be peaceful, may you live in safety, may you
* Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com [141210 15:41]:
I was just suggesting the usage of a standard config systems:
Automake, cmake...
No, this has been discussed internally befor many times. The project
already moved from autotools, scons, cmake to the current state.
So far it served us very
* Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com [141210 16:09]:
Thanks insteresting. Which gcc is this? Are you sure you build with
a 64 bit assembler there?
Please note that the 32bit version of the Assembler don't have that
row.
Interesting, we only ran into this with Apple's Mach-O assembler.
It
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [141210 16:33]:
* Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com [141210 16:09]:
Thanks insteresting. Which gcc is this? Are you sure you build with
a 64 bit assembler there?
Please note that the 32bit version of the Assembler don't have that
row
Hi Marco,
thanks for all your help so far. Could I ask for one more try?
please do a make PLATFORM=cygwin confclean or start from scratch and add
HACK_APPLY=0
to the make options.
Does this compile succeed? Does a make check work then?
We already do this for the mingw platform, so we should
15 matches
Mail list logo
