I have to admit that I thought it was quite confusing too. Perhaps if it
said, This rule also applies to Cygwin itself because Cygwin is also a
package?
Just my 2p/c/whatever.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19,
at 04:25:36PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Is there no way that the list program can rewrite the reply-to line? That
would Make Things Easier(TM), IMHO of course :)
How about if I just block any email that mentions Reply-To? That
would make things a lot easier for me.
cgf
completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:21:17PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
I have to admit that I thought it was quite confusing too. Perhaps if it
said, This rule also applies to Cygwin itself because Cygwin is also a
package?
Now, *that's* confusing.
So the cygwin package should say
Well, I've just taken a look at this and it's groovy. I think any froody
dude who knows where his towel is should have this...
Carl :)
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:23 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: bash
Oops. Having actually read the new setup.html I see that the @ line is now
optional. Okay, so now I feel stupid and I shall see to it that I get a
severe beating in order to ensure that this never happens again.
Sorry 'bout that.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Ebrey, Carl [mailto
Hi,
I tried to send a mail to cygwin-announce this morning to announce FIGlet.
However it just got rejected by the cygwin-announce moderator with no
reason. Who's the moderator who rejected it and could he/she explain why so
I can see about correcting any errors please?
Thanks,
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:16 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: FIGlet (again)
Hey! What a question! Sure we are really happy to get any help.
Documentation is some of the stuff where a helping hand
