Updated: whois-4.6.14-1

2004-05-07 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Whois version 4.6.14 is now available. Please upload when convenient. BINARY: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.14-1.tar.bz2 SOURCE: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.14-1-src.tar.bz2 HINT: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/setup.hint

RE: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7

2003-09-22 Thread Mark Bradshaw
] Subject: Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7 On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:30:21PM -0400, Mark Bradshaw wrote: I've got new whois packages (4.6.7) ready for upload. The URL is http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/. Please always send the full URLs to the files to upload. Corinna

Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7

2003-09-21 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I've got new whois packages (4.6.7) ready for upload. The URL is http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/. Mark

Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6

2003-07-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I've got new whois 4.6.6 packages ready for upload. They are built against 1.5.0, so I guess they need to be set as Test packages. The URL is: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/ Mark Bradshaw Salem Web Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9401 Courthouse Road, Suite 300 Chesterfield, VA 23832

RE: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6

2003-07-11 Thread Mark Bradshaw
no one will suffer if they stick with 1.3.x and the old whois. Mark Bradshaw Salem Web Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9401 Courthouse Road, Suite 300 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804.768.9404 x100 -Original Message- From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2

RE: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.1 (fwd)

2003-02-06 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Package: Whois 4.6.1 Hi, On 27-Dec-2002 20:07, Mark Bradshaw wrote: The most recent version of GNU Whois (4.6.1) has been uploaded to sourceware. This version no longer works with .org domains. Looks like 4.6.2 is out on http://www.linux.it/~md/software/ . Would it be possible to release

whois update: 4.6.1

2002-12-26 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I've got an update to the whois package at http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois. Could someone please look it over and upload if it's OK.

Re: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe

2002-11-19 Thread Mark Bradshaw
If a small howto would fix the problem then I think Mike Erdeley's would've fixed it, but it hasn't. - Original Message - From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: Re: Detecting

Fw: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe

2002-11-19 Thread Mark Bradshaw
) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:10 PM Subject: Re: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe Perhaps I'm misreading Max's intent but I believe he's suggesting that there is more to gain by understanding, categorizing

Re: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe

2002-11-19 Thread Mark Bradshaw
- Original Message - From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:05 PM Subject: Re: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe And to reply to Mark

RE: TCP Wrappers

2002-03-22 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I'd love to see it. -Original Message- From: Prentis Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TCP Wrappers Ok, that was two votes ;) I have been using the code for several months now, so I am pretty confident

RE: last package

2002-01-17 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Ok Chuck. Thanks for the demo. :o) I should have utmpdump wrapped up tomorrow, with a patch to cygutils. I'll also zip up my killall version to see if you want to include that. Mark -Original Message- From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17,

RE: last package

2002-01-16 Thread Mark Bradshaw
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: last package On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:06:08PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: Charles: OK. Scratch killall. I didn't realize it used /proc. :o( Anyway, what do you want for last and utmpdump. Anyone else: Is there anyone currently working

RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw
9:06 AM To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: last package Sounds good. Rob === - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:53 AM Subject: last package Any interest in a ported version

RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw
: Base requires: cygwin -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:09 AM To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: last package - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw
:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM Subject: RE: last package Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit package

RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done. -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: last package I'll take a look at it. -Original Message- From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw
, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done. It doesn't matter. If you don't like to port it, just forget it. I just thought it would be a good idea to borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen

RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Charles: OK. Scratch killall. I didn't realize it used /proc. :o( Anyway, what do you want for last and utmpdump. Anyone else: Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have plans that direction? Mark -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent

FW: whois package

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Bradshaw
you are. http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois Mark -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:35 AM To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: whois package - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw

RE: whois package

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Actually, hold that thought. There's been an update, and it's decently important... :o( -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:21 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: FW: whois package Robert, I think I'm all ready. I've made the changes you

RE: whois package

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I'm sorry to keep putting you guys through this, but could someone check over the new packages. I've updated from 4.5.15 to 4.5.17, which included an update to the .edu name servers. http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois Mark -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent

RE: whois package

2002-01-07 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Fixed. I'm not sure how the cygwin readme in the source package is supposed to be named/located. I just dropped it in there. Mark -Original Message- From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:16 PM To: Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: whois

RE: whois package

2002-01-04 Thread Mark Bradshaw
small type correction: sdesc: GNU Whois ldesc: A client for the whois directory service. It allows you to retrieve information on domain names, IP addresses, and more. category: Net requires: cygwin -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:20 PM

RE: whois package

2001-12-07 Thread Mark Bradshaw
with some modification Mark -Original Message- From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:55 AM To: Mark Bradshaw Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: whois package Hallo Mark, 2001-12-07 09:31:41, du schriebst: I would be interested