Updated: whois-4.6.14-1
Whois version 4.6.14 is now available. Please upload when convenient. BINARY: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.14-1.tar.bz2 SOURCE: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.14-1-src.tar.bz2 HINT: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/setup.hint
RE: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7
http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.7-1.tar.bz2 http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/whois-4.6.7-1-src.tar.bz2 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7 On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:30:21PM -0400, Mark Bradshaw wrote: I've got new whois packages (4.6.7) ready for upload. The URL is http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/. Please always send the full URLs to the files to upload. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Updated Package: Whois 4.6.7
I've got new whois packages (4.6.7) ready for upload. The URL is http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/. Mark
Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6
I've got new whois 4.6.6 packages ready for upload. They are built against 1.5.0, so I guess they need to be set as Test packages. The URL is: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/ Mark Bradshaw Salem Web Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9401 Courthouse Road, Suite 300 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804.768.9404 x100
RE: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6
I haven't changed the hint file in forever. I didn't think maintainers needed to after the first release. I just assumed christopher or corrinna did that in the main copy for updates. I don't think I'll need to worry about compiling 4.6.6 against 1.3.22. The upgrade isn't anything magical, so no one will suffer if they stick with 1.3.x and the old whois. Mark Bradshaw Salem Web Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9401 Courthouse Road, Suite 300 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804.768.9404 x100 -Original Message- From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:35 PM To: Mark Bradshaw Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6 On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Mark Bradshaw wrote: I've got new whois 4.6.6 packages ready for upload. They are built against 1.5.0, so I guess they need to be set as Test packages. The URL is: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/ Mark Bradshaw Mark, You'll need to set the packages up as test packages yourself, in your setup.hint. You could probably do it by simply adding the prev: 4.5.15-1 curr: 4.5.17-1 test: 4.6.6-1 lines to your setup.hint, but I may have missed something. Also, it looks like you're using this as an opportunity to upgrade the package to a new upstream release, as well. You may want to first release the new version compiled against 1.3.22, and then release 4.6.6-2 compiled against 1.5.0. Again, it's your choice as the maintainer. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster. -- Patrick Naughton
RE: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.1 (fwd)
I've got the new 4.6.2 packages ready for upload. The URL is: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pavel Tsekov Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.1 (fwd) Forwarding here just in case that it goes unnoticed in the main list due to the large volume of messages there. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 12:14:59 +0100 From: Michael Schaap [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.1 Hi, On 27-Dec-2002 20:07, Mark Bradshaw wrote: The most recent version of GNU Whois (4.6.1) has been uploaded to sourceware. This version no longer works with .org domains. Looks like 4.6.2 is out on http://www.linux.it/~md/software/ . Would it be possible to release this version, at your convenience? TIA, - Michael -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
whois update: 4.6.1
I've got an update to the whois package at http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois. Could someone please look it over and upload if it's OK.
Re: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe
If a small howto would fix the problem then I think Mike Erdeley's would've fixed it, but it hasn't. - Original Message - From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: Re: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see any problem with being mutually exclusive, though. If someone wants Cygwin, they don't need NetworkSimplicity. ( Better still would be for NetworkSimplicity to metamorphose from a binary distribution to a HOWTO ) Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://netsim.ibforums.com/index.php?act=STf=1t=194 The third post shows the problem. People don't know where to go once they're done with the installer. OK... so wouldn't a (*very* small) HOWTO solve that? Max.
Fw: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe
Maybe some of it would. I think the problem is that the cygwin installer assumes that you actually know about cygwin and want to install it. I think there's a lot of windows folks who hear about ssh/openssh and want it, but don't know about or want the cygwin environment. They just want to push next a few times and have an openssh server, never mind this bash stuff. I'm not sure you can really fix the cygwin installer, since it's not broken. It's just too general for the task. As I've told Rob I've about reached the end of my interest in doing a separate package. In fact that's been the case for a while, but I'm not sure I have any good input on how to handle this problem in another fashion other than a separate install process. I'd certainly be willing to help if someone has a suggestion. Mark - Original Message - From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:10 PM Subject: Re: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe Perhaps I'm misreading Max's intent but I believe he's suggesting that there is more to gain by understanding, categorizing, and finding the solution to users' problems with Cygwin's OpenSSH installation than in trying to generate a different, incompatible installation. Wouldn't at least some of what you've learned about creating your OpenSSH version based on Cygwin be helpful in making the Cygwin installation simpler? Is there a reason not to pursue this goal? Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Re: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe
- Original Message - From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:05 PM Subject: Re: Detecting NetworkSimplicity in setup.exe And to reply to Mark at the same time: At 12:50 PM 11/19/2002, Mark Bradshaw wrote: If a small howto would fix the problem then I think Mike Erdeley's would've fixed it, but it hasn't. It's out of date, as far as I can see (now even simpler), and not wonderfully easy to find. If it was up to date, and easy to find, then I think it *would* have fixed the problem. He's probably in the same boat I am. Not enough time. Corinna would be the ideal person to handle this, being the closest person to it, but I don't think she's at all interested. I might be assuming too much there. Mark
RE: TCP Wrappers
I'd love to see it. -Original Message- From: Prentis Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TCP Wrappers Ok, that was two votes ;) I have been using the code for several months now, so I am pretty confident with it. The packages can be downloaded from http://www.stonegard.com/cygwin/ Let me know when you have gotten them, or should I get access to push them up myself somehow? -- Prentis Brooks| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure Security A knight is sworn to valor. His heart knows only virtue. His blade defends the helpless. His word speaks only truth. His wrath undoes the wicked. - the old code of Bowen, last of the dragonslayers
RE: last package
Ok Chuck. Thanks for the demo. :o) I should have utmpdump wrapped up tomorrow, with a patch to cygutils. I'll also zip up my killall version to see if you want to include that. Mark -Original Message- From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: last package Christopher Faylor wrote: I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com: cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co . Feel free to add a cygutils directory. Okay -- I've added it and imported v0.9.7. Also, I've added Mark's last implementation and the supporting autotools changes so that last builds within cygutils. There is a licensing problem with Mark's changes to utmpdump so we're still waiting on that and his killall implementation. Mark -- to see the diff, do the following: $ export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps $ cvs login (Logging in to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) CVS password: anoncvs $ cvs co cygutils $ cd cygutils $ cvs diff -r v0_9_7 my_patch Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. cvs server: Diffing . cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file bootstrap cvs server: Diffing licenses cvs server: Diffing src-bsd cvs server: Diffing src-gpl cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.1 cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.c cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/lastb.1 cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/oldutmp.h cvs server: Diffing src-pd Translation: I added the last.1, lastb.1, last.c and oldutmp.h files to the src-gpl subdirectory. I made additional changes to: AUTHORS (added Mark) ChangeLog (always a good idea...) PROGLIST (added last) README (mentioned last) src/Makefile.am ( This is the biggie ) src/Makefile.in (running bootstrap regenerates this based on the Makefile.am changes) That's the kind of thing that I'd expect as a large add a new program to cygutils patch. --Chuck
RE: last package
Charles, When you get back to reading the list, I'm ready to include last, utmpdump, and killall (working without /proc!) in cygutils. Drop me a line... Mark -Original Message- From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:11 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: last package On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:06:08PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: Charles: OK. Scratch killall. I didn't realize it used /proc. :o( Anyway, what do you want for last and utmpdump. Anyone else: Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have plans that direction? Oooh... big job... pretty beeg job... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
RE: last package
Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit package. What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone else's package? Technically it's no problem... -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:06 AM To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: last package Sounds good. Rob === - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:53 AM Subject: last package Any interest in a ported version of last for cygwin? I find it useful when some sort of remote shell program is run on cygwin (i.e. openssh). Mark
RE: last package
Cool. I'm not too sure which category is appropriate. I thought possibly either Base or Utils. sdesc: last ldesc: This utility searches through historical information kept in /var/log/wtmp to determine who logged in, where they came from, when they logged in, and how long they stayed. category: Base requires: cygwin -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:09 AM To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: last package - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM Subject: RE: last package Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit package. What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone else's package? Technically it's no problem... Yep, no problem. Rob
RE: last package
I'll take a look at it. -Original Message- From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: last package On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM Subject: RE: last package Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit package. What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone else's package? Technically it's no problem... Yep, no problem. Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it. Btw., while you're at it, what about utmpdump? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
RE: last package
Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done. -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: last package I'll take a look at it. -Original Message- From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: last package On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM Subject: RE: last package Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit package. What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone else's package? Technically it's no problem... Yep, no problem. Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it. Btw., while you're at it, what about utmpdump? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
RE: last package
I don't mind. It's already done, actually. Now I'm eyeing up their version of killall too. Mark -Original Message- From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:47 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: last package On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done. It doesn't matter. If you don't like to port it, just forget it. I just thought it would be a good idea to borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
RE: last package
Charles: OK. Scratch killall. I didn't realize it used /proc. :o( Anyway, what do you want for last and utmpdump. Anyone else: Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have plans that direction? Mark -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:01 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: last package I think they would fit there just fine. All three of them (will be finished with killall soon). What do you need from me? Mark
FW: whois package
Robert, I think I'm all ready. I've made the changes you and Gerrit suggested. Small correction to the Makefile in the source to correct the prefix. Slightly expanded readme to explain the patch and how to apply it. Patch and readme moved to a CYGWIN-PATCHES directory. whew I'm ready when you are. http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois Mark -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:35 AM To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: whois package - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just wanted to drop in a reminder about the whois package. Could I get an official/unofficial nanny to check it over, or at least a note telling me to shut up til people have more time? Looks OK Mark. Does it build OOTB? I ask because the source archive has no CYGWIN_PATCHES directory in it. If it doesn't build OOTB then the place to put your patch is in CYGWIN_PATCHES/ in the src archive, along with a README about what's needed to recreate the binary package (for folk building custom versions - i.e. with different configure switches. Once that's answered/corrected, then I'll uplaod for you. As a side note... you might be interested in utilising one of Chuck's scripts for the packaging process - grab the source tarball for nearly any of his packages, or the src tarball for libxsl (which has a script I customised from Chucks), and a lot of the mechanics can be automated easily. Rob
RE: whois package
Actually, hold that thought. There's been an update, and it's decently important... :o( -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:21 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: FW: whois package Robert, I think I'm all ready. I've made the changes you and Gerrit suggested. Small correction to the Makefile in the source to correct the prefix. Slightly expanded readme to explain the patch and how to apply it. Patch and readme moved to a CYGWIN-PATCHES directory. whew I'm ready when you are. http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois Mark -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:35 AM To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: whois package - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just wanted to drop in a reminder about the whois package. Could I get an official/unofficial nanny to check it over, or at least a note telling me to shut up til people have more time? Looks OK Mark. Does it build OOTB? I ask because the source archive has no CYGWIN_PATCHES directory in it. If it doesn't build OOTB then the place to put your patch is in CYGWIN_PATCHES/ in the src archive, along with a README about what's needed to recreate the binary package (for folk building custom versions - i.e. with different configure switches. Once that's answered/corrected, then I'll uplaod for you. As a side note... you might be interested in utilising one of Chuck's scripts for the packaging process - grab the source tarball for nearly any of his packages, or the src tarball for libxsl (which has a script I customised from Chucks), and a lot of the mechanics can be automated easily. Rob
RE: whois package
I'm sorry to keep putting you guys through this, but could someone check over the new packages. I've updated from 4.5.15 to 4.5.17, which included an update to the .edu name servers. http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois Mark -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:30 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: whois package Actually, hold that thought. There's been an update, and it's decently important... :o( -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:21 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: FW: whois package Robert, I think I'm all ready. I've made the changes you and Gerrit suggested. Small correction to the Makefile in the source to correct the prefix. Slightly expanded readme to explain the patch and how to apply it. Patch and readme moved to a CYGWIN-PATCHES directory. whew I'm ready when you are. http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois Mark -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:35 AM To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: whois package - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just wanted to drop in a reminder about the whois package. Could I get an official/unofficial nanny to check it over, or at least a note telling me to shut up til people have more time? Looks OK Mark. Does it build OOTB? I ask because the source archive has no CYGWIN_PATCHES directory in it. If it doesn't build OOTB then the place to put your patch is in CYGWIN_PATCHES/ in the src archive, along with a README about what's needed to recreate the binary package (for folk building custom versions - i.e. with different configure switches. Once that's answered/corrected, then I'll uplaod for you. As a side note... you might be interested in utilising one of Chuck's scripts for the packaging process - grab the source tarball for nearly any of his packages, or the src tarball for libxsl (which has a script I customised from Chucks), and a lot of the mechanics can be automated easily. Rob
RE: whois package
Fixed. I'm not sure how the cygwin readme in the source package is supposed to be named/located. I just dropped it in there. Mark -Original Message- From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:16 PM To: Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: whois package Hallo Christopher, Am 2002-01-05 um 00:09 schriebst du: sdesc: GNU Whois ldesc: A client for the whois directory service. It allows you to retrieve information on domain names, IP addresses, and more. category: Net requires: cygwin Didn't even notice the typo. FWIW, this gets my vote. It is not stripped: === $ ll total 46 -rwxr-xr-x1 Siebensc Administ46642 Dec 13 21:42 whois.exe* $ strip * $ ll total 24 -rwxr-xr-x1 Siebensc Administ24576 Jan 5 02:03 whois.exe* The Cygwin Readme isn't included in the source package: === $ ls whois-4.5.15-1/ Makefile as_del_list ip_del_listpo/ whois.1 Makefile.am config.h make_as_del.pl*test-whois.pl* whois.c README data.h make_ip_del.pl*tld_serv_list whois.h TODO debian/ make_tld_serv.pl* whois-4.5.15.patch whois.spec Besides these LITTLE issues I vote pro;) Gerrit -- =^..^= mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: whois package
small type correction: sdesc: GNU Whois ldesc: A client for the whois directory service. It allows you to retrieve information on domain names, IP addresses, and more. category: Net requires: cygwin -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:20 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: whois package picky, picky. :o) sdesc: GNU Whois ldesc: A client for the whois directory service. It allows you to retrieve information on domains name, IP addresses, and more. category: Net requires: cygwin -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: whois package On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 04:47:23PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: I finally got around to putting together the whois package I talked about back in December. If whoever handles new packages could take a look at it and check it out I'd appreciate it. Files are at: http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/setup.hint BZTT. *Post* the setup.hint file. cgf
RE: whois package
Going back to dig and host, I'm guessing that the maintainer would need to actually be a maintainer for the whole bind package? Am I right in assuming that having bind as a cygwin package would provide libresolv functionality, or would more be required. BTW, I can get bind 9.2 to compile with some modification Mark -Original Message- From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:55 AM To: Mark Bradshaw Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: whois package Hallo Mark, 2001-12-07 09:31:41, du schriebst: I would be interested in being a package maintainer for GNU whois (and maybe dig and host down the road). Any interest in such? Yes I'm interested;) Which whois do you want to maintain? http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/jwhois.html http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/whois.html And dig and host are from the bind package? There are no resolv functions in cygwin, so libresolv or libbind is needed too, will you maintain that too? Gerrit -- convey Information Systems GmbH http://www.convey.de/ Vitalisstraße 326-328 Gerrit P. Haase D-50933 Köln [EMAIL PROTECTED]Fon: ++49 221 6903922
