From: Reini Urban
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
are close to getting this fixed, Max?
Why not get rid of the complicated tar = bz2 stack and just
check for
.tar.bz2 and use a simplified approach then, which makes
sure that
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:04:29AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Those of you that do not follow the Cygwin list should look at
the thread http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg00354.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg00280.html
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, John Morrison wrote:
From: Igor Pechtchanski
done base-files-manifest.lst
^^^
Shouldn't this be /etc/preremove/base-files-manifest.lst?
humm, prob, I didn't know where the script was run from, but
a full path would
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 21 10:15, Morrison, John wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
I guess that's ok. Otherwise this package will never make it into the
release so, Max, please upload.
*wild applause*
Yay!
Thanks Max and Corinna :)
J.
This e-mail has come from Experian International
Max Bowsher wrote:
No one has reviewed my subversion source package, so I
started tried to do it myself, by trying to build in a new clean
minimal cygwin install.
I found and fixed number of problems - mostly missing build
requirements - and a final build in the clean environment completed
Max Bowsher wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
No one has reviewed my subversion source package, so I
started tried to do it myself, by trying to build in a new clean
minimal cygwin install.
I found and fixed number of problems - mostly missing build
requirements
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hi John,
Hi all,
In libwmf's sdesc and ldesc should Windows and Microsoft
have a stroke through the o? (sorry to whoever's language
uses this character, I really should know what it's called!)
Just wondering,
I copied it from the libwmf website, it is also in
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi folks,
we've been trying this 3 votes plus review game for a long time now
and some people have been packaging a bunch of packages for a while
without any real problems. Gerrit is one of the people who's pretty
active in adding new packages and his packages are
Max Bowsher wrote:
Accordingly, I hereby ITP subversion
Binary package looks good, checkout works :)
+1 for inclusion from me. I've not checked the source
package, I don't have all the dependancies installed here.
J.
This e-mail has come from Experian International: winner of the UK's
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
/etc/profile.d
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
I have been having trouble find manual pages with man for some time,
but I haven't had time to investigate it further, because
unset MANPATH
always restored the functionality. Today I
From: Dr. Volker Zell
o The packaging list claims that the sample sgreprc file is
located under
/etc/defaults/etc/sample.sgreprc
but it actually is under
/etc/defaults/sgreprc
Is this the right location anyway ? and shouldn't it get copied to
/usr/share in a postinstall script
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:39:43PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
This is great. Thanks for making a quick release to get this in. I
have repackaged the distcc package for Cygwin for this new release.
Our platform-specific patch now contains only our Cygwin README
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 8 11:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:27:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 8 14:14, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
Good idea, except that I'd personally prefer
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi,
There are a bunch of applications, which, for security reasons, want
to set $PATH to a fixed value. This approach is a bit tricky on
Windows, since the needed paths to the Windows system directories
are not fixed
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:23:28PM -, John Morrison wrote:
As per the thread [RFC] Globally creating a user and a group root
I've modified the base-passwd packaged to remove user and group which
match the pattern :S-1-1-0: and ensure that there's a group
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:55:11AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:23:28PM -, John Morrison wrote:
As per the thread [RFC] Globally creating a user and a group
root I've modified the base-passwd packaged to remove
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
John,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:44:44PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:29:08PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Eh, no. I was thinking about a postinstall script, which checks
for Everyone (S-1-0-0) in /etc/passwd
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 08:33:24AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
any chance you can poke the base-passwd script soon, to check for a
user and a group with SID S-1-1-0 in the existing /etc/passwd and
/etc/group files and remove them silently
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:05:02AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 08:33:24AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
any chance you can poke the base-passwd script soon, to check for
a user and a group
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:24:55AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:58:52AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I don't know exactly
but it's possible that W2K doesn't have these SeDenyWhatever user
rights.
editrights
OK, took some lunch time ;)
Hows this for passwd-grp.sh
-
#!/bin/sh
if [ ! -e /etc/passwd -a ! -L /etc/passwd ] ; then
/bin/mkpasswd -l -c /etc/passwd
fi
if [ ! -e /etc/group -a ! -L /etc/group ] ; then
/bin/mkgroup -l -c /etc/group
fi
cp -f
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 01:24:15PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
OK, took some lunch time ;)
Hows this for passwd-grp.sh
-
#!/bin/sh
if [ ! -e /etc/passwd -a ! -L /etc/passwd ] ; then
/bin/mkpasswd -l -c /etc/passwd
fi
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Maintainers/Packages List, 2003-11-22)
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:17:51PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-11-24T11:01-0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
) On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:55:40AM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
) For now it's just in my records. Even if it is
Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-11-22T20:05-, John Morrison wrote:
) base-files ... !!! no source and no external-source
) base-passwd ... !!! no source and no external-source
) There is no source for these packages, they just contain
) shell and postinstall scripts. Should I do something?
Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
The shell profile file (e.g. ~/.bash_profile for bash) has to be
updated to reflect this change:
keychain ~/.ssh/id_rsa
. ~/.keychain/${HOSTNAME}-sh
There exists a /etc/skel/.bash_profile, would it be a good idea
to add (one of?) these lines (commented out) to
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:22:50PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 05:58 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, you wrote:
What about generating a root group with mkgroup -l by default?
root:S-1-5-32-544:0:
The question is then, should it *also* generate an administrators
entry
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:25:21AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:22:50PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 05:58 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, you wrote:
What about generating a root group with mkgroup -l by default?
root:S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package recompiled and example noved to:
/etc/defaults/etc/sample.sgreprc
as suggested in Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:35:36 +0100 by Daniel Reed
Jari, *please* call it /etc/defaults/etc/.sgreprc and copy
*ONLY* if /etc/.sgreprc doesn't
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:19:19PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package recompiled and example noved to:
/etc/defaults/etc/sample.sgreprc
as suggested in Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:35:36 +0100 by Daniel Reed
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:48:59PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The other problem is that files with leading dot are not visible
with `ls' by default. Giving it a name in the default dir, which
makes it visible, isn't a bad idea, IMHO
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:08:45PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Wait, I thought we're talking about a system-wide sgreprc file which
is expected in /usr/share. Did I get that wrong?
AFAICR, the postinstall for sgrep copies the sample from
Morrison, John wrote:
2.11.1 has just been released...
Original from http://distcc.samba.org
This is a first attempt. It still needs quite a lot of setup to
use. I'm working on the postinstall which will do more of the work,
but I thought this might be of use to some folk as it stands
Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-10-06T15:20+0100, Morrison, John wrote:
snipwork appended stuff/snip
Can you clarify this note, or was its inclusion a mistake? Any
message sent to the cygwin-apps mailing list will be archived and
made publicly
The test for mk[passwd|group|group_l_d] and the resulting messages are as
safe as we (Igor and Pierre premier amongst others) can make it. Some other
safeguards improved.
Thanks,
J.
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-files/md5sum
md5sum for base-file-2.0-3.tar.bz2 =
OK, so I think the script as stands is...
case `id -ng` in
mkpasswd )
echo Your group is currently \mkpasswd\. This indicates that
echo the /etc/passwd (and possibly /etc/group) files should be rebuilt.
echo See the man pages for mkpasswd and mkgroup then, for example, run
echo mkpasswd
Hi all,
Igor and I have been having a chat about the warning/error messages
which appear when there's something wrong with /etc/[passwd|group].
Here's what we are considering so far...
case `id -ng` in
mkpasswd )
echo The /etc/passwd (and possibly /etc/group) files need to be
rebuilt.
I get a load of mdoc warnings about Empty input line when
I run man wtf. Don't know if it's an issue.
J.
==
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
John,
I like having 3 separate messages.
Perhaps you could add an introduction such as
echo Your group is currently \mkpasswd\. This indicates
that ..
Good idea :)
The first two cases should never occur, except in rare cases of
postinstall screw up or if
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
John Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last update (fingers crossed!) for a while.
Oh well, not to be :)
Uploaded.
Would you also accept the following patch for your next release? It
elliminates an annoying warning when /etc/profile.d/ doesn't exist.
snip
Fixed some of the issues folks have been emailing about,
regtool -q, quotes, defaults for other shells, mk[passwd|group[_l_d]],
could somebody upload?
Thanks,
J.
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-files/md5sum
md5sum for base-file-2.1-1.tar.bz2 =
Minor change from Cary D. Renzema, put around the ${groupID} variable.
Cary, I didn't do the 'if [ -z $MANPATH ]; then' change you recommended
for
two reasons;
1, if the variable is empty appending it has no effect anyway and
2, only one set of data needs to be maintained.
OK, so I could do
Hi all,
I tried to send an email to -apps this morning from one of my home accounts,
it bounced because that account is not actually subscribed. I actually have
one subscribed account which .forwards to others.
Would it be possible (all meaness aside ;) to have one subscribed address
for
Igor,
Thanks!
On this machine (it's domain rather than home which isn't)
$ mkgroup -cl | grep mkgroup_l_d
mkgroup_l_d:S-1-5-21-1491927668-2094530616-1660491571-1141:11141:
I'll just add it to the test with the same message, it'll
be repackaged in a minute or two (will post then).
Thanks
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:37:27PM +0100, Morrison, John wrote:
Added mkgroup_l_d check
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-
files/md5sum
md5sum for base-file-2.0-2.tar.bz2 =
5d112cfd0b17195e7dcef6cc174cb4d1
http
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
John,
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, John Morrison wrote:
At last, a new version of base-files to try :)
[snip]
I've also added a test for id -ng = mkpasswd or = mkgroup
along with a message. Hopefully this might cut down on the number
of I have
Added mkgroup_l_d check
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-files/md5sum
md5sum for base-file-2.0-2.tar.bz2 = 5d112cfd0b17195e7dcef6cc174cb4d1
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j-n-s.morrison/john/cygwin/base-files/base-fil
es-2.0-2.tar.bz2
md5sum for setup.hint =
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
As per John Morrison's suggestion, I would like to contribute and
maintain wtf
(http://cronus.comp.utas.edu.au/~thsutton/computing/wtf.html).
wtf(6) is a utility provided by some UNIX and UNIX-like systems
including Slackware Linux and NetBSD. It translates
I just found this, thought it might be fun to package
http://cronus.comp.utas.edu.au/~thsutton/computing/wtf.html
and add the cygwin specific acronyms :)
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/
snip from=the man page
wtf - translates acronyms and filename suffixes for you.
The wtf program looks-up the
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Morrison, John wrote:
I just found this, thought it might be fun to package
http://cronus.comp.utas.edu.au/~thsutton/computing/wtf.html
and add the cygwin specific acronyms :)
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/
snip from=the man page
wtf
Max Bowsher wrote:
John Morrison wrote:
Hi Max,
Please excuse me for writting to you off list, but I
am trying to compile the setup app. Again.
You are excused,
Thanks :)
since I definitely want to help people compile
setup, but I'm redirecting to the list, as this is relevant there,
Max Bowsher wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
It seems the instructions are out of date.
You need to run ./bootstrap.sh in setup (and it will recurse into
libgetopt++).
bootstrap.sh isn't executable as checkedout of cvs...
Hmm. Just checked, and libgetopt++/bootstrap.sh
Max Bowsher wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
$ make release
snipcompiling messages/snip
windres --preprocessor gcc -mno-cygwin -E -xc-header -DRC_INVOKED
--include-dir . -o res.o res.rc
make: *** No rule to make target `zlib/libzcygw.a', needed
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Throwing an exception would indicate a problem actually, if you want
to get all by-the-book about it.
I'm with Gary here, I'd prefer see an exception thrown for a problem.
Unless there's some issues with using exceptions that I don't know about...
(which, given
Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 04:17, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Unless there will ever be a need to ask a page whether
it would take activation in the future, but not activate it
immediately, even if it is possible to do so, I think the 2 calls
should be merged. Will there ever
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
drwxr-xr-x root/None 0 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/
-rw-r--r-- root/None 17169 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/joerc
-rw-r--r-- root/None 16344 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/jmacsrc
-rw-r--r-- root/None 15142 2003-07-04
From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello John,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
drwxr-xr-x root/None 0 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/
-rw-r--r-- root/None 17169 2003-07-04 14:17:34 etc/joe/joerc
[...]
These would be better copied into
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 23:12, Alex Tibbles wrote:
snip
I don't care whether you use std::string, or
String++ for any new code,
as long as:
1) You don't leak memory (std::string will leak if
you use c_str())
IIRC.
I've been unable to confirm this. I tried the
Sorry guys, that should have been to the list.
From: Pierre A. Humblet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable.
From: Max Bowsher
PS: Attached is a patch which colour-codes version numbers in setup.
Obviously its going to require much discussion before
checkin, but it is
what allowed me to notice the bug so easily.
The colour code is:
Dark Blue:[curr]
Cyan:[prev]
Yellow-Brown: [prev]
From: Joshua Daniel Franklin [mailto:joshuadfranklin;yahoo.com]
I don't know if it's possible to really 'vote' for cygwin-mketc.sh
since it's not a package, but I tested it on my Win2000 Pro PC and it
worked fine. I like the idea of it and it should help the occasional
user that creates
From: Paul Johnston [mailto:paj;pajhome.org.uk]
Hi John,
It's true that it doesn't work with the broken cygpath, but
it doesn't do
anything bad in that case, and the bug is very clearly with
the cygpath binary.
One thought I had was to add the second line to this error message:
From: Morrison, John [mailto:John.Morrison;uk.experian.com]
(I hate replying to myself :(
From: Paul Johnston [mailto:paj;pajhome.org.uk]
Hi John,
It's true that it doesn't work with the broken cygpath, but
it doesn't do
anything bad in that case, and the bug is very clearly
From: Paul Johnston [mailto:paj;pajhome.org.uk]
Hi,
Cygpath is part of the cygwin package. I'm running the
current latest
1.3.14-1, which was compiled on Wed, 23 Oct. It still has the bug.
Perhaps this should be fixed first?
Yes, I agree. The problem was something to do with
The default umask has been changed, but the new /etc/profile
won't have overwrote your old one.
J.
From: Ross Smith II [mailto:ross;smithii.com]
Attached are three small patches to the following files:
/bin/ssh-host-config
/bin/ssh-user-config
/usr/doc/Cygwin/openssh-3.4p1-5.README
(sorry Pavel, ment to sent to list!)
From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
1. doxygen
version: 1.2.18-1
status : reviewed, fixed package is available for review
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-09/msg00107.html
votes : 4 (Joshua, Lapo, Nicholas and Robert)
You
I think, if this key thing goes ahead, somebody is going to
have to come up with a *very* detailed method of getting a
key and signing things with regards to cygwin stuff. Making
a package for cygwin _is_ not easy for people who grew up
in windows. I'm sure it's put lot's of people off
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Update:
procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me,
discussion needed)
doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package
cleanup needed(?))
astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo,
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Guys,
I'm still missing the pro votes.
Looks OK to me. Unpacked, man pages/docs OK, didn't have
any problems with the quick test of any of the exes...
J.
===
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Anything you want me to do?
Keep your files at those URL's. I've a *bunch* of cygwin work
to do, and will upload when I do that.
Ack :) Not a problem. Do nothing - yep, can comply with that :)
J.
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 09:52:02AM +0100, Morrison, John wrote:
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Guys,
I'm still missing the pro votes.
Looks OK to me. Unpacked, man pages/docs OK, didn't have
any
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 03:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:58:27PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Rob would *really* like to get this functionality out of setup...
It's easy enough for Rob to coordinate.
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes:
I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an
external file.
All' it needs is *someone* willing to be a package
Can you strip a rebased DLL?
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Kevin,
I guess I know what the problem is about your packaged cygcurl-2.dll.
In both current packages 7.9.6-1 and 7.9.8-1 you have packaged a
stripped DLL. It seems when you rebase a stripped DLL the resulting
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:46:18AM +0100, Morrison, John wrote:
Can you strip a rebased DLL?
Yes.
Does it work (as opposed to a rebased stripped DLL) was the
intended question ;)
J
(Sorry Robert - ment to send to list!)
Just pulled the source - looks like C++ to me :)
J.
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I quite like the concept of a GUI for sftp, and as it uses
cygwin1.dll,
it's definitely in the right line of software to be an inclusion
candidate.
Can't the window be resizable? It would be nice to integrate it
because if it looses the focus you can't alt-tab to it atm :(
J.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Also if (some time) functionality is added to show the ldesc
than we even need more space (or a separate
From: Gary R. Van Sickle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Would it be a good idea to number the setup.exe's in the same
manner as all other packages and keep them in the new release
(under /setup?) directory? The download could then proceed as
usual except the warning that there's a new
Hi All,
I've done a quick grep but didn't throw anything useful up, so
please excuse me if the idea has been fielded before.
Would it be a good idea to number the setup.exe's in the same
manner as all other packages and keep them in the new release
(under /setup?) directory? The download could
Personally, I'd rather identify the apps which _arn't_ GNU. I didn't know
that the (current) version of which for cygwin wasn't the GNU version. This
ment that I kept wondering why it wasn't in 'sync' with the 'latest' GNU
one.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL
Would it be a good idea for the setup.hint file to have something along the
lines of:
Maintainer: John Morrison
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? This would allow folks to email the maintainer directly without having to
bug the list.
For example, I didn't know that Corinna was the maintainer of the
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 09:21:44AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Would it be a good idea for the setup.hint file to have
something along the
lines of:
Maintainer: John Morrison
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:37:31PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Morrison, John wrote:
And here's the setup.hint
I found a problem with the bash_completion as stands...
I have a path ~/Applications/Apache Group/ with no other directory in
Applications starting with 'A'. When I cd ~/Applications/A[tab] it doesn't
autocomplete.
When I look through the shell script I can see...
snippit
# Turn on extended
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 11:22 am
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:02:07AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
I found a problem
December 2001 11:29 am
To: Morrison, John
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Units
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:40:35PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Hi,
I've packaged up the latest version of units.
I've just uploaded it to sourceware.
You might consider to send a message to [EMAIL
If you'll pardon the pun, which version of which are we running? The GNU
version is currently 2.13 and I just wondered if folks would like and
update...? (it compiles OOTB)
J.
===
Information in this email and any
I wasn't sure that:
1) we were using the GNU which (which --version doesn't work) and
2) by offering to update the package I wouldn't be offending the current(?)
maintainer.
J.
BTW - It wasn't 1.5 in particular I wanted to know but whether it was the
GNU which we were using. Which's are
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:39:13AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Thanks. Will do.
btw, since you prob a *lot* more about bash than I do
(since you're the
maintainer for cygwin ;) have you any idea's why that's
scripts messing cd's
auto completion up?
Prepared
Corinna - is there any pro's/cons (besides not maintaining your own version)
for/against using the GNU version?
J.
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 12:47 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: which which
On
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: which which
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:29:54PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Corinna - is there any pro's/cons (besides not maintaining
your own version)
for/against using the GNU version?
Dunno. I never compared them. If you compare them and you're
Thanks.
btw - did you have a look at the bash completion script I posted about the
other day?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 10:27 am
To: Gary R. Van Sickle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Units
Sounds like
OK,
The setup.hint and bz2 packages can be found at:
http://www.straylight.eu.org/~carl/bash_completion/
Here's the hint file...
sdesc: A script of Bash completion rules.
ldesc: A relatively new feature in bash is programmable completion,
which has been available since the beta version of
Cc: Morrison, John; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Earnie Boyd wrote:
I think that `category: Utils' is too generic. I'd prefer Misc but
that's reserved. How about `category: Shell Utils'?
In the current grammar, `category: Shell Utils
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 4:17 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:04:22AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats
Would folks like to consider adding this to the distribution...?
http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml#completion
It's a file of autocompletions, for example, typing ssh [tab][tab] lists (or
completes) hostnames based on the contents of your known_hosts files.
J.
I've email'd the author - he's blessed the port. I've also asked him to
keep me in touch with new versions.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 17 December 2001 11:31 am
To: Morrison, John
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Units
Hi,
I've packaged up the latest version of units. Carl's kindly lent me some
disk space. Would people take a look and tell me if it's OK?
http://www.straylight.eu.org/~carl/units/
gnu_intro
Units is a program for units conversion and units calculation. The program
converts quantities
97 matches
Mail list logo
