Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Charles did you forget about this ?
o http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-02/msg00042.html
This release obsoletes the mktemp package; you should upgrade both
packages at the same time or do coreutils second, to ensure that you still
have a mktemp program.
Um,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Charles Wilson on 2/23/2008 9:08 AM:
| The mktemp package's setup.hint now specifies the _obsolete category.
| The package directory has been moved from release/mktemp/ to
| release/_obsolete/mktemp.
|
| What's to do?
|
| I thought about
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Eric Blake wrote:
According to Charles Wilson on 2/23/2008 9:08 AM:
| The mktemp package's setup.hint now specifies the _obsolete category.
| The package directory has been moved from release/mktemp/ to
| release/_obsolete/mktemp.
|
| What's to do?
|
| I thought about
Igor Peshansky wrote:
They won't complain until they try to uninstall mktemp and find their
coreutils incomplete... That wouldn't be a very common situation (so no
rush), but it would be nice to do what you propose at some point.
Well, the best time to do that is whenever coreutils is next
Charles Wilson wrote:
Igor Peshansky wrote:
They won't complain until they try to uninstall mktemp and find their
coreutils incomplete... That wouldn't be a very common situation (so no
rush), but it would be nice to do what you propose at some point.
Well, the best time to do that is
