Re: [ITA] nano package
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: Lapo Luchini wrote: PS: AFAIR the g-b-s' deps target lists them all, but cygport's dep does not. The g-b-s deps check was based on cygcheck, which shows the entire dependency tree, where cygport uses objdump, which lists only those that the binary is linked against. The latter option can sometimes be slower (*cough*KDE*cough*), but is much more accurate. By default, cygcheck eliminates duplicates in the list of DLL dependencies, even if they previously appeared at a deeper level of dependency nesting. Adding the -v option causes it to list all dependencies without eliminating duplicates (except that there is a bug that causes the following line: Warning: C:/cygwin/bin\cygreadline6.dll hides C:\cygwin\bin\cygreadline6.dll to be repeated quite a few times, but that's something to be fixed separately). So, the solution would be to use cygcheck -v program in the g-b-s based scripts and to select from the output lines with exactly two leading spaces. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!) |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary. Go and study it. -- Rabbi Hillel
[ITA] nano package
Lapo Luchini wrote: Hi Gareth, just a quick question: do you plan to support the current nano-2.0.x branch in your Cygwin package relases? Gareth replied privately to me that's ok with him if I adopt the package. Should anyone take a look at the packaging? http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 Lapo -- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OpenPGP X.509) www.lapo.it (Jabber, ICQ, MSN)
Re: [ITA] nano package
Lapo Luchini wrote: Lapo Luchini wrote: Hi Gareth, just a quick question: do you plan to support the current nano-2.0.x branch in your Cygwin package relases? Gareth replied privately to me that's ok with him if I adopt the package. Should anyone take a look at the packaging? http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 Lapo Just confirming the above. Additionally, if anyone wants any of my other packages they are free to do so. I read the mailing list and will respond to questions about my packages (if they don't get eaten by spam filtering or an overzealous delete key) but have no plans to update any of them. --Gareth
Re: [ITA] nano package
On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 Looks good, uploaded. Thanks for taking over, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [ITA] nano package
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 Looks good, uploaded. Thanks for taking over, Corinna http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#JAa. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!) |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary. Go and study it. -- Rabbi Hillel
Re: [ITA] nano package
Corinna Vinschen writes: On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 Looks good, uploaded. setup.hint should only include direct dependencies: cygport nano-2.0.6-1.cygport dep cygwin-1.5.25-4 libintl8-0.15-1 libncurses8-5.5-3 Ciao Volker
Re: [ITA] nano package
Igor Peshansky wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 Looks good, uploaded. Thanks for taking over, Corinna http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#JAa. Doh? ;-) -- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OpenPGP X.509) www.lapo.it (Jabber, ICQ, MSN)
Re: [ITA] nano package
Igor Peshansky wrote: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#JAa. Doh? ;-) Sort of. Just making sure this time things don't get buried in the TODO list... :-) Uh.. not exactly: I was dohing to the fact that that I'm not quite as active as Jari is, in adopting packages 0=) (second hint: #JAa vs #LL :P) -- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OpenPGP X.509) www.lapo.it (Jabber, ICQ, MSN)
Re: [ITA] nano package
Dr. Volker Zell wrote: setup.hint should only include direct dependencies OK, noted (for next revision). PS: AFAIR the g-b-s' deps target lists them all, but cygport's dep does not. -- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OpenPGP X.509) www.lapo.it (Jabber, ICQ, MSN)
Re: [ITA] nano package
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Lapo Luchini wrote: Igor Peshansky wrote: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#JAa. Doh? ;-) Sort of. Just making sure this time things don't get buried in the TODO list... :-) Uh.. not exactly: I was dohing to the fact that that I'm not quite as active as Jari is, in adopting packages 0=) (second hint: #JAa vs #LL :P) D'oh indeed. Chalk it off to the lack of sleep and doing things in a hurry. Should be fixed now: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#LL. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!) |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary. Go and study it. -- Rabbi Hillel
Re: [ITA] nano package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Lapo Luchini wrote: PS: AFAIR the g-b-s' deps target lists them all, but cygport's dep does not. The g-b-s deps check was based on cygcheck, which shows the entire dependency tree, where cygport uses objdump, which lists only those that the binary is linked against. The latter option can sometimes be slower (*cough*KDE*cough*), but is much more accurate. Yaakov -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHZ1hEpiWmPGlmQSMRCMVdAJ9N6e1oiO7dMVrbB04+HVRGndRBzgCg73sv yqUubyXiNEKVcMvsFVeMT6Q= =eJvH -END PGP SIGNATURE-
