[ITA] pinfo

2014-05-13 Thread Andrew Schulman
I'd like to adopt the pinfo package, since I use it. I have a new build of the latest version, 0.6.10, ready for x86 and x86_64, with a new cygport build script. I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do. If there's no objection, I think I can just add pinfo to my !packages file in the

Re: [ITA] pinfo

2014-05-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:03:19PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: I'd like to adopt the pinfo package, since I use it. I have a new build of the latest version, 0.6.10, ready for x86 and x86_64, with a new cygport build script. I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do. If there's no

Re: [ITA] pinfo

2014-05-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 13 15:03, Andrew Schulman wrote: I'd like to adopt the pinfo package, since I use it. I have a new build of the latest version, 0.6.10, ready for x86 and x86_64, with a new cygport build script. I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do. If there's no objection, I think I

Re: [ITA] pinfo

2014-05-13 Thread Andrew Schulman
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:03:19PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: I'd like to adopt the pinfo package, since I use it. I have a new build of the latest version, 0.6.10, ready for x86 and x86_64, with a new cygport build script. I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do. If there's