I'd like to adopt the pinfo package, since I use it. I have a new build of
the latest version, 0.6.10, ready for x86 and x86_64, with a new cygport
build script.
I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do. If there's no
objection, I think I can just add pinfo to my !packages file in the
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:03:19PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
I'd like to adopt the pinfo package, since I use it. I have a new build of
the latest version, 0.6.10, ready for x86 and x86_64, with a new cygport
build script.
I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do. If there's no
On May 13 15:03, Andrew Schulman wrote:
I'd like to adopt the pinfo package, since I use it. I have a new build of
the latest version, 0.6.10, ready for x86 and x86_64, with a new cygport
build script.
I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do. If there's no
objection, I think I
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:03:19PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
I'd like to adopt the pinfo package, since I use it. I have a new build of
the latest version, 0.6.10, ready for x86 and x86_64, with a new cygport
build script.
I'm not sure if there's anything else I need to do. If there's