Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-10 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've applied a slight variation of this patch. I kept the exit in usage but made it exit 1 when usage was given an argument. Thanks. Maybe such debugging is overkill, but this kind of thing helped me a lot during the porting/patching of Guile and

Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-09 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - add debugging feature: drop to shell upon failure I normally run mknetrel in the background. In fact, I just added a couple of options to accommodate this. They would conflict with this patch. Ok. If you want to add this functionality,

Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-09 Thread Earnie Boyd
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Btw: A very silly question, but I can't seem to get `cvs diff' to respect your (Cygwin's?) wishes of excluding the ChangeLog from the diff. It doesn't grok -X,--exclude options, most annoying. How do you manage? Remove the ChangeLog diff from

Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-09 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Btw: A very silly question, but I can't seem to get `cvs diff' to respect your (Cygwin's?) wishes of excluding the ChangeLog from the diff. It doesn't grok -X,--exclude options, most annoying. How do you manage? Remove the ChangeLog

Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-09 Thread Earnie Boyd
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Btw: A very silly question, but I can't seem to get `cvs diff' to respect your (Cygwin's?) wishes of excluding the ChangeLog from the diff. It doesn't grok -X,--exclude options, most annoying. How do you

Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-09 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That's why I am investigating transitioning us to a cygwin port of cvsnt (no, it's not just for native windows anymore...) And it does work with emacs' pcvs.el, right? The thing about the ChangeLog stuff, is that it really isn't that non-standard.

Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-09 Thread Charles Wilson
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: That's why I am investigating transitioning us to a cygwin port of cvsnt (no, it's not just for native windows anymore...) And it does work with emacs' pcvs.el, right? Dunno. It's based on the cvs code; most of the changes are (a) bugfixes -- what a concept (b)

Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-09 Thread Robert Collins
:42 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Hrmm. If you're going to have nonstandard requests, it would be handy if these somehow would be handled automagically. How dead is CVS development, maybe they would take a patch? Deader than

Re: [PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:45:46PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: 2002-07-09 Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] * bin/mknetrel: Invoke atexit () before exiting. (atexit): New function. (drop): New funtion. (usage): Return (previously: exit unsuccessfully).

[PATCH]: mknetrel builds Guile #2: debug

2002-07-08 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
- add debugging feature: drop to shell upon failure diff -purNX .cvsignore ../mknetrel.jcn1.init/.cvsignore ./.cvsignore --- ../mknetrel.jcn1.init/.cvsignoreMon Jul 8 15:42:06 2002 +++ ./.cvsignoreMon Jul 8 16:04:09 2002 @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ CVS *~ #* .#* +.bash_mknetrel diff