On 14/09/2012 01:43, Warren Young wrote:
On 9/13/2012 5:09 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 13/09/2012 03:23, Warren Young wrote:
5. Several build system files refer to iniparse.h, but on my system,
iniparse.yy yields iniparse.hh, not .h.
See the note on a Slightly backward-incompatible change in
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 05:22:33PM +, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 14/09/2012 01:43, Warren Young wrote:
On 9/13/2012 5:09 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 13/09/2012 03:23, Warren Young wrote:
5. Several build system files refer to iniparse.h, but on my system,
iniparse.yy yields iniparse.hh, not .h.
On Sep 13 11:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:08:36PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/12/2012 09:42 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On 9/12/2012 9:28 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
If you're going to do that you really should (re)learn how to submit a
proper patch. A patch
On 13/09/2012 03:23, Warren Young wrote:
5. Several build system files refer to iniparse.h, but on my system,
iniparse.yy yields iniparse.hh, not .h. In a fresh CVS checkout, this causes:
$ ./bootstrap.sh
...noise noise noise...
$ make
GEN setup_version.c
make: *** No
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:08:36PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/12/2012 09:42 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On 9/12/2012 9:28 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
If you're going to do that you really should (re)learn how to submit a
proper patch. A patch uses diff -u format and contains a ChangeLog.
On 9/13/2012 5:09 AM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 13/09/2012 03:23, Warren Young wrote:
5. Several build system files refer to iniparse.h, but on my system,
iniparse.yy yields iniparse.hh, not .h.
See the note on a Slightly backward-incompatible change in the section
Changes to Yacc and Lex support
It's that time of decade again...time for me to patch setup.exe again.
But oh noes! The README instructions are wrong, and the program doesn't
build correctly from a fresh checkout. Hafta fix that first.
1. The README implies that you need automake 1.9 and libtool 1.5,
exactly. I didn't
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:23:58PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
It's that time of decade again...time for me to patch setup.exe again.
If you're going to do that you really should (re)learn how to submit a
proper patch. A patch uses diff -u format and contains a ChangeLog.
But, thanks for the
On 9/12/2012 9:28 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
If you're going to do that you really should (re)learn how to submit a
proper patch. A patch uses diff -u format and contains a ChangeLog.
It's been a decade since I last used cvs diff. I forgot that it
doesn't include -u, since svn diff does
On 09/12/2012 09:42 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On 9/12/2012 9:28 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
If you're going to do that you really should (re)learn how to submit a
proper patch. A patch uses diff -u format and contains a ChangeLog.
It's been a decade since I last used cvs diff. I forgot
10 matches
Mail list logo