Re: [RFU] bc-1.06-2 [Was: bc and readline]

2005-01-05 Thread Lapo Luchini
Christopher Faylor wrote: bc is simple and problem-free enough that I don't mind maintaining it. I'll upload a new version with readline support shortly. Ahhh, I should've waited just a tiny bit longer =) Lapo -- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available)

Re: [RFU] bc-1.06-2 [Was: bc and readline]

2005-01-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 01:41:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I've unpacked source and binary packages and they are both ok from what I can tell. What's missing is a setup.hint file which adds the new dependencies and Chris' final goodbye to the package. bc is simple and problem-free enough

Re: [RFU] bc-1.06-2 [Was: bc and readline]

2004-12-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 27 01:11, Lapo Luchini wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Isn't Chris the bc maintainer? I'm pretty sure he won't object if you'd take over maintainership ;-) Here is my attemp. Really nothing was necessary, except a one-liner patch (duplicate definition of readline()). Readline

Re: [RFU] bc-1.06-2 [Was: bc and readline]

2004-12-27 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Corinna Vinschen wrote: I've unpacked source and binary packages and they are both ok from what I can tell. What's missing is a setup.hint file which adds the new dependencies and Chris' final goodbye to the package. Yes, of course, that would be

[RFU] bc-1.06-2 [Was: bc and readline]

2004-12-26 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Corinna Vinschen wrote: Isn't Chris the bc maintainer? I'm pretty sure he won't object if you'd take over maintainership ;-) Here is my attemp. Really nothing was necessary, except a one-liner patch (duplicate definition of readline()). Readline