Hi Jon,
On Jul 1 01:08, JonY wrote:
Hi,
Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each
category, thanks.
may I ask you a favor? It would be really helpful if you could add
a statement what versions exactly to remove, perhaps even in the form
of an easy `rm' command.
On 7/2/2012 17:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Jul 1 01:08, JonY wrote:
Hi,
Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each
category, thanks.
may I ask you a favor? It would be really helpful if you could add
a statement what versions exactly to remove,
On Jul 2 17:43, JonY wrote:
On 7/2/2012 17:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Jul 1 01:08, JonY wrote:
Hi,
Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each
category, thanks.
may I ask you a favor? It would be really helpful if you could add
a
Hi,
Here are the new builds, please remove the oldest versions from each category,
thanks.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686-runtime/mingw64-i686-runtime-3.0b_svn5134-1-src.tar.bz2
Hi,
New refresh is up, please remove the oldest version from each package except
pthreads. Thanks.
Btw, do I need to submit an announce message for each package? Some
announcements tend to disappear.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:06:24PM +0800, JonY wrote:
Btw, do I need to submit an announce message for each package?
No, you don't need to send a separate announcement for each package.
Some announcements tend to disappear.
Actualy, it's more likely that some senders of email tend to ignore
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:12:08AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:06:24PM +0800, JonY wrote:
Btw, do I need to submit an announce message for each package?
No, you don't need to send a separate announcement for each package.
Some announcements tend to disappear.
On Jan 8 08:06, JonY wrote:
Hi,
there was a bug that caused GCC to spill spurious warnings about printf
formats. This release fixes it.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-headers/mingw64-i686-headers-3.0b_svn4725-1.tar.bz2
Hi,
there was a bug that caused GCC to spill spurious warnings about printf
formats. This release fixes it.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-headers/mingw64-i686-headers-3.0b_svn4725-1.tar.bz2
On Dec 19 21:24, JonY wrote:
On 12/19/2011 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 12/17/2011 11:35 PM, JonY wrote:
New mingw-w64 build is ready. Remove the oldest in each category,
leave pthreads.
A user requested a recent bugfix to be propagated.
Sorry for the inconvenience, can you remove
Hi,
Here's the fixed binutils for i686 mingw-w64. Well, at least it is confirmed to
be working on my machine.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-binutils/mingw64-i686-binutils-2.22.51-2-src.tar.bz2
On Dec 20 19:45, JonY wrote:
Hi,
Here's the fixed binutils for i686 mingw-w64. Well, at least it is confirmed
to be working on my machine.
On 12/19/2011 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 12/17/2011 11:35 PM, JonY wrote:
New mingw-w64 build is ready. Remove the oldest in each category,
leave pthreads.
A user requested a recent bugfix to be propagated.
Sorry for the inconvenience, can you remove the recently uploaded headers and
On 12/19/2011 05:12, Cary R. wrote:
Hi Jon,
It would be very nice if the headers/runtime could be from svn 4683 or later.
4683 fixed a problem regarding SSIZE_MAX that prevents me from
cross-compiling Icarus Verilog without performing a manual hack to the code.
Since I have a solution I
On 12/17/2011 11:35 PM, JonY wrote:
New mingw-w64 build is ready. Remove the oldest in each category, leave
pthreads.
Done.
--
Chuck
Hi,
New mingw-w64 build is ready. Remove the oldest in each category, leave
pthreads.
Thanks.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-binutils/mingw64-i686-binutils-2.22.51-1-src.tar.bz2
Hi,
Here's a refresh of the mingw-w64.
For the headers and runtime, remove 4075 and 4214, for both i686 and x86_64
archs.
Please remove the oldest version for the others.
BTW, is GCC 4.6 for Cygwin anywhere near? :)
Thanks.
On Aug 31 15:15, JonY wrote:
Hi,
Here's a refresh of the mingw-w64.
For the headers and runtime, remove 4075 and 4214, for both i686 and x86_64
archs.
Please remove the oldest version for the others.
Done. Btw., would you mind to restructure your download directories so
that they
On 8/31/2011 17:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 31 15:15, JonY wrote:
Hi,
Here's a refresh of the mingw-w64.
For the headers and runtime, remove 4075 and 4214, for both i686 and x86_64
archs.
Please remove the oldest version for the others.
Done. Btw., would you mind to restructure
On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote:
On 8/31/2011 17:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 31 15:15, JonY wrote:
BTW, is GCC 4.6 for Cygwin anywhere near? :)
4.5.3 is near, afaik.
OK, I was wondering how to transition 4.5.x to 4.6.x for mingw-w64
when the time comes, pthreads-win32 will be
On Aug 31 09:54, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote:
C++ ABI for 4.6.x has also changed for mingw* (including mingw.org)
with the introduction of thiscall, not sure if this will affect
Cygwin itself.
[...]
OTOH, the cygwin project DOES provide several precompiled C++
On 8/31/2011 22:12, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 31 09:54, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote:
C++ ABI for 4.6.x has also changed for mingw* (including mingw.org)
with the introduction of thiscall, not sure if this will affect
Cygwin itself.
[...]
OTOH, the cygwin
On 8/31/2011 21:54, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote:
On 8/31/2011 17:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 31 15:15, JonY wrote:
BTW, is GCC 4.6 for Cygwin anywhere near? :)
4.5.3 is near, afaik.
OK, I was wondering how to transition 4.5.x to 4.6.x for mingw-w64
when
On 8/31/2011 10:08 PM, JonY wrote:
On 8/31/2011 21:54, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, JonY wrote: Hmm. don't know what the
correct (mingw[64]) solution for this would be. In the past, when
the C++ ABI changed, we didn't bump the libstdc++ DLL number,
because so many other things
Hi,
here's the headers and runtime refresh, binutils and gcc should still be good.
Keep the older copies.
wget
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-headers/mingw64-i686-headers-3.0b_svn4373-1.tar.bz2
\
On Aug 11 19:16, JonY wrote:
Hi,
here's the headers and runtime refresh, binutils and gcc should still be good.
Keep the older copies.
wget
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/mingw64-i686/mingw64-i686-headers/mingw64-i686-headers-3.0b_svn4373-1.tar.bz2
On 11 August 2011 12:13, JonY wrote:
OK, much thanks, I need to find more time to do a full rebuild next time.
Any chance we can get a 4.6.x release when you get around to it?
Thank you,
Chris
--
Chris Sutcliffe
http://emergedesktop.org
http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Here's an update for mingw-w64 packages, see the attached list.txt for
wget links. SF should really allow anonymous read-only FTP.
Please keep the previous version and remove the others.
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
On 3/15/2011 11:20 AM, JonY wrote:
Here's an update for mingw-w64 packages, see the attached list.txt for
wget links. SF should really allow anonymous read-only FTP.
Please keep the previous version and remove the others.
Done.
--
Chuck
29 matches
Mail list logo
