Re: ITP: rxvt-W

2006-03-26 Thread Charles Wilson
Charles Wilson wrote: int main() { int rc; Display* dpy = XOpenDisplay(NULL); /* null lets XOpenDisplay handle querying for $DISPLAY */ rc = !(dpy == NULL); if (dpy) XCloseDisplay(dpy); return rc; /* exits with status of 0 if X available */ } [snip] I'd also need to fiddle with PATH

Re: ITP: rxvt-W

2006-03-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 21 02:34, Charles Wilson wrote: So, long term plan: (1) obsolete the current rxvt package (maybe not officially put it in the _obsolete category, but it's still on Corinna's missing-maintainer list, so...) (2) rxvt-unicode-X and rxvt-unicode-W packages, installed

Re: ITP: rxvt-W

2006-03-21 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 21 02:34, Charles Wilson wrote: So, long term plan: (1) obsolete the current rxvt package (maybe not officially put it in the _obsolete category, but it's still on Corinna's missing-maintainer list, so...) (2)

Re: ITP: rxvt-W

2006-03-21 Thread Charles Wilson
(Sorry about the broken thread; webmail sux) Corinna sez: On Mar 21 10:13, Igor Peshansky wrote: On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: ...how do you plan to replace the old rxvt functionality from the user's perspective? This I don't see in your description. So far the user can

Re: ITP: rxvt-W

2006-03-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 21 12:52, Charles Wilson wrote: I have one concern with that plan, tho: Would the transparent_exe logic ALSO extend to other PATHEXT extensions? Does 'foo' conflict with 'foo.bat' (and foo.com, foo.vbs, foo.cmd, foo.wsh, ...) or ONLY with 'foo.exe'? foo doesn't conflict with anything

Re: ITP: rxvt-W

2006-03-21 Thread Charles Wilson
Corinna said: On Mar 21 12:52, Charles Wilson wrote: I have one concern with that plan, tho: Would the transparent_exe logic ALSO extend to other PATHEXT extensions? Does 'foo' conflict with 'foo.bat' (and foo.com, foo.vbs, foo.cmd, foo.wsh, ...) or ONLY with 'foo.exe'? foo doesn't

Re: ITP: rxvt-W

2006-03-21 Thread Charles Wilson
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:41:32 -0500, Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Corinna said: On Mar 21 12:52, Charles Wilson wrote: There's one other minor issue, too: the batch file (but not the #! script) would be limited to 9 command-line parameters. Really? I think the cmd shell

ITP: rxvt-W

2006-03-20 Thread Charles Wilson
cygwin README file for a discussion of the taxonomy of Win32 Xlib replacement libraries and their internal architectures. === http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP/rxvt-W-2.7.10-1-src.tar.bz2 http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP/rxvt-W-2.7.10-1.tar.bz2 http://cygutils.fruitbat.org