Re: Link for MORE

2002-03-19 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
I have no objection if the original contributors want to take the cygutils source package, rip out everything that isn't (for instance) 'mkshortcut'-related, and release a standalone autotool'ed mkshortcut. (However, I'm not pushing for that.) Personally, I feel a good test is whether it's

Re: Link for MORE

2002-03-17 Thread Earnie Boyd
Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:19 AM I suppose you could do this but the purists would say you should do export PAGER /bin/less Good point. Hey, Robert, why not add

Re: Link for MORE

2002-03-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:23:38AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:19 AM Could do - chat to Chris, the basefiles package maintainer :}. Sorry, once upon a time, some time ago, setup

Re: Link for MORE

2002-03-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:56:30AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:39 AM Actually, I don't think there is any reason to have a default /etc/profile for ash. I think it is really only

Re: Link for MORE

2002-03-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 11:08:17AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:56:30AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:39 AM Actually, I don't think

Re: Link for MORE

2002-03-17 Thread Earnie Boyd
Christopher Faylor wrote: Well, my interest begins and ends with the file creation being moved somewhere sensible. Simply running setup should not create /etc/profile any more than installing sed. Yep. Agreed. I'm not sure I agree. It doesn't matter what creates it, it needs

Re: Link for MORE

2002-03-17 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: If someone wants to contribute, I think it should just be a standard package. Chuck, I hate to say this, but I don't see a real reason for growing cygutils. The more packages we add to cygutils, the more we go back to the old way of installing cygwin packages

Re: Link for MORE

2002-03-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 01:59:21PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: If someone wants to contribute, I think it should just be a standard package. Chuck, I hate to say this, but I don't see a real reason for growing cygutils. The more packages we add to cygutils, the more