doxygen (reviewed, 4 votes, Joshua, Lapo, Nicholas and Robert,
package cleanup needed)
CMake (reviewed, 2 votes, Gerrit and Nicholas,
setup file correction needed)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin
Hello,
doxygen (reviewed, 4 votes, Joshua, Lapo, Nicholas and Robert,
still package cleanup needed(?))
Ryunosuke? It's your call.
Sorry but give me time for brushing up this package.
I will solve some problems about TeX output.
since Tex output is only one
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
CMake (NOT reviewed, 0 votes)
I voted for this way back when it was on its first go around
and I'll vote for it again.
I also have reviewed it, and everything seems to be in
order, except a minor issue with the setup.hint. Running
cygcheck on ccmake.exe
doxygen (reviewed, 4 votes, Joshua, Lapo, Nicholas and Robert,
still package cleanup needed(?))
Ryunosuke? It's your call.
CMake (NOT reviewed, 0 votes)
Pavel, I'm not available from next week on up to 5th ov November.
I really appreciate that you volunteer
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 19:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
I'll upload updates if notified here. Oh, once a day, so allow 24 hr
turnaround :}
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:26:08PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 19:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
I'll upload updates if notified here. Oh, once a day, so allow 24 hr
turnaround :}
Rob
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
Not being funny, but this probably shouldn't be the case. I could easily
spoof some mail headers and get a compromised binary uploaded. I think there
should probably be a more thorough review process than there is
Chris January wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
Not being funny, but this probably shouldn't be the case. I could easily
spoof some mail headers and get a compromised binary uploaded.
Then I suggest you (and other that find in this a
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:36, Chris January wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
Not being funny, but this probably shouldn't be the case. I could easily
spoof some mail headers and get a compromised binary uploaded. I think there
should
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
Not being funny, but this probably shouldn't be the case. I could easily
spoof some mail headers and get a compromised binary uploaded.
Then I suggest you (and other that find in this a security problem) to
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 21:11, Chris January wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
Not being funny, but this probably shouldn't be the case. I could easily
spoof some mail headers and get a compromised binary uploaded.
Then I suggest
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:21:33PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
IMO:
* official packages are not supplanted by 3rd party sites with bad
versions (for example, binutils from kde-cygwin should not overwrite
binutils from cygwin without telling the user).
* Corrina, Chris and I should be
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 21:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
It's still Corinna.
Doh. I'm thumb fingered at the moment, I think my keyboard (which is new
when I got a devel pc) doesn't agree with me. Sorry!
the list as a ready-to-upload package is indeed from the maintainer.
Thats about it.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:39:16PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 21:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
It's still Corinna.
Doh. I'm thumb fingered at the moment, I think my keyboard (which is new
when I got a devel pc) doesn't agree with me. Sorry!
Ok.
They ARE out to get
Hi!
Sorry, replied to the wrong mailing list in the first place.
Hi Robert,
Right, well I'll happily run generate checksums of what I download, and
if the poster to here posts the expected checksums, in a gpg signed
message, then we can be fairly sure that whomever sent the email,
created
Thank you Tsekov, for reviewing many times by my mistake.
I fixed these problems of astyle package.
1) The README says:
- should read../astyle-(VERSION).patch
2) The text in the README is with CR/LF endings. This is not a showstopper
at all IMO.
3) You suddenly changed
Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ryunosuke Satoh [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: Package review status
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote:
The binary package looks OK. I'm not a doxygen user and I don't know
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote:
Thank you Tsekov, for reviewing many times by my mistake.
No problem :) I think this one is ready now! :) Of course if no one else
has to add something.
doxygen (reviewed, 4 votes, Joshua, Lapo, Nicholas and Robert,
package cleanup needed(?))
astyle (reviewed, 3 votes, Gareth, Lapo and Pavel,
package cleanup needed)
Ryunosuke, did you tweak your packages already?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Hi
doxygen (reviewed, 4 votes, Joshua, Lapo, Nicholas and Robert,
package cleanup needed(?))
astyle (reviewed, 3 votes, Gareth, Lapo and Pavel,
package cleanup needed)
Ryunosuke, did you tweak your packages already?
Yes, I did.
These packages are
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote:
Hi
doxygen (reviewed, 4 votes, Joshua, Lapo, Nicholas and Robert,
package cleanup needed(?))
astyle (reviewed, 3 votes, Gareth, Lapo and Pavel,
package cleanup needed)
Ryunosuke, did you tweak your
Sorry.
The -1 is missing from the filename of your revised packages, as well from
fixed.
Now the situation is the following - the setup.hint which is included in
the root of the astyle-1.15.3-package.tar.gz containst the following line:
test: 1.2.17
fixed.--curr:1.15.3-1
Now
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote:
doxygen
http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/doxygen-1.2.17-1-package.tgz
The binary package looks OK. I'm not a doxygen user and I don't know how
to test it :) So I've just run the executables to see that they are
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote:
I made same mistakes in doxygen-package, fixed similarly.
doxygen
http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/doxygen-1.2.17-1-package.tgz
astyle
I've checked the astyle package. I think it is ready to be uploaded now.
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote:
The binary package looks OK. I'm not a doxygen user and I don't know how
to test it :) So I've just run the executables to see that they are
working.
I've been pretty busy, but I'll definitely look at it more
closely as
25 matches
Mail list logo
