Someday, I'm sure that I'll understand why people insist on redirecting
cygwin-apps discussions to cygwin.
Anyway, I'm redirecting this back to the correct mailing list.
cgf
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:31:30AM -0700, Dario Alcocer wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 06:08:46AM +0100, John Morrison
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 01:07:57PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Someday, I'm sure that I'll understand why people insist on redirecting
cygwin-apps discussions to cygwin.
Oops, I realized I had typed in the wrong address in the To:,
of course right after I sent the darn e-mail off :-(
Dario Alcocer wrote:
Are there any guidelines or suggestions regarding packaging
source, patches and binaries for programs (like Ghostscript)
that can be built for either Cygwin or Cygwin/XFree86?
Unless I hear a very compelling reason to do otherwise, I'm
planning on releasing three binary
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 10:14:09AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Dario Alcocer wrote:
Are there any guidelines or suggestions regarding packaging
source, patches and binaries for programs (like Ghostscript)
that can be built for either Cygwin or Cygwin/XFree86?
Unless I hear a very
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:47:28PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Of course, then there is my other rule that X apps live in the
release/XFree86 hierarchy. I guess I should amend this rule to
mean strictly X apps. It wouldn't make sense to scatter your
distribution into different directories
Dario Alcocer wrote:
Are there any guidelines or suggestions regarding packaging
source, patches and binaries for programs (like Ghostscript)
that can be built for either Cygwin or Cygwin/XFree86?
Not yet...
Unless I hear a very compelling reason to do otherwise, I'm
planning on
Charles Wilson wrote:
for non-x:
prefix = /usr
sysconfdir = /etc
CFLAGS=${MY_CFLAGS} LDFLAGS=${MY_LDFLAGS} \
${srcdir}/configure \
--srcdir=${srcdir} --prefix=${prefix} \
--exec-prefix=${prefix} --sysconfdir=${sysconfdir} \
--libdir=${prefix}/lib
I would go ahead and allow ALL of the scripts and man pages to be
duplicated (bdftops, font2c, gslj, etc) into both /usr/bin/|/usr/man and
/usr/X11R6/bin|/usr/X11R6/man -- without any renaming.
Or have a ghostscript-docs-x.y.z which just contains documents...
J.
---
Outgoing mail is
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 07:02:31PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
I would go ahead and allow ALL of the scripts and man pages to be
duplicated (bdftops, font2c, gslj, etc) into both /usr/bin/|/usr/man and
/usr/X11R6/bin|/usr/X11R6/man -- without any renaming.
Or have a ghostscript-docs-x.y.z
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 07:02:31PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
I would go ahead and allow ALL of the scripts and man pages to be
duplicated (bdftops, font2c, gslj, etc) into both /usr/bin/|/usr/man and
/usr/X11R6/bin|/usr/X11R6/man -- without any renaming.
Or
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 07:02:31PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
I would go ahead and allow ALL of the scripts and man pages to be
duplicated (bdftops, font2c, gslj, etc) into both /usr/bin/|/usr/man and
/usr/X11R6/bin|/usr/X11R6/man -- without any renaming.
Or have a
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:47:28PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 06:57:23AM -0700, Dario Alcocer wrote:
Are there any guidelines or suggestions regarding packaging
source, patches and binaries for programs (like Ghostscript)
that can be built for either Cygwin or
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 02:12:29PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 07:02:31PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
I would go ahead and allow ALL of the scripts and man pages to be
duplicated (bdftops, font2c, gslj, etc) into both /usr/bin/|/usr/man and
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 02:38:13PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 07:02:31PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
I would go ahead and allow ALL of the scripts and man pages to be
duplicated (bdftops, font2c, gslj, etc) into both /usr/bin/|/usr/man
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 04:02:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 02:38:13PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 07:02:31PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
I would go ahead and allow ALL of the scripts and man pages to be
Dario Alcocer wrote:
For X:
prefix = /usr/X11R6
sysconfdir = /etc
CFLAGS=${MY_CFLAGS} LDFLAGS=${MY_LDFLAGS} \
${srcdir}/configure \
--srcdir=${srcdir} --prefix=${prefix} \
--exec-prefix=${prefix} --sysconfdir=${sysconfdir} \
--libdir=${prefix}/lib
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 07:02:31PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
I would go ahead and allow ALL of the scripts and man pages to be
duplicated (bdftops, font2c, gslj, etc) into both
/usr/bin/|/usr/man and
/usr/X11R6/bin|/usr/X11R6/man -- without any renaming.
Nicholas Wourms
Dario Alcocer wrote:
Well, my personal preference has always been to include whatever
documentation a package has, whether it be man pages or supplementary
HTML documentation. I figure if space is really an issue for a
particular user, they can delete the documentation if
18 matches
Mail list logo
