Re: Request for review: anthy 9100h+0.4

2020-06-04 Thread Yasuhiro KIMURA
From: Yaakov Selkowitz via Cygwin-apps Subject: Re: Request for review: anthy 9100h+0.4 (Re: Update of packages by non-maintainer) Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 12:41:14 -0400 >> Anyway version number issue has sloved. So I would like to request for >> review of anthy 9100h+0.4. >

Re: Request for review: anthy 9100h+0.4 (Re: Update of packages by non-maintainer)

2020-06-03 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz via Cygwin-apps
version number issue has sloved. So I would like to request for > review of anthy 9100h+0.4. Not ready yet; see comments inline. > * As for cygwin local patch, 9100h-no-undefined.patch is changed to > make it fit to new source tree. Others are removed. [snip] > * Add "MAKEOPTS=

Request for review: anthy 9100h+0.4 (Re: Update of packages by non-maintainer)

2020-06-03 Thread Yasuhiro KIMURA
yway version number issue has sloved. So I would like to request for review of anthy 9100h+0.4. Changes from 9100h-2 are: * Source is switched to version 0.4 from Debian forked Anthy project. * VERSION is changed to "9100h+0.4" to keep version number from going backword. * Fedora patchs