Christopher Faylor wrote:
bc is simple and problem-free enough that I don't mind maintaining
it. I'll upload a new version with readline support shortly.
Ahhh, I should've waited just a tiny bit longer =)
Lapo
--
Lapo Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available)
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 01:41:30PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I've unpacked source and binary packages and they are both ok from what
I can tell. What's missing is a setup.hint file which adds the new
dependencies and Chris' final goodbye to the package.
bc is simple and problem-free enough
On Dec 27 01:11, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Isn't Chris the bc maintainer? I'm pretty sure he won't object if
you'd take over maintainership ;-)
Here is my attemp.
Really nothing was necessary, except a one-liner patch (duplicate
definition of readline()).
Readline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I've unpacked source and binary packages and they are both ok from
what I can tell. What's missing is a setup.hint file which adds
the new dependencies and Chris' final goodbye to the package.
Yes, of course, that would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Isn't Chris the bc maintainer? I'm pretty sure he won't object if
you'd take over maintainership ;-)
Here is my attemp.
Really nothing was necessary, except a one-liner patch (duplicate
definition of readline()).
Readline
On Dec 22 21:12, Lapo Luchini wrote:
man bc states that bc can be compiled to support readline library.
This could be very handy.. why cygwin's bc does not?
I like the idea. I'm always stumbling over bc's inability to allow
proper editing.
Problems specific to Cygwin or simply it is not
man bc states that bc can be compiled to support readline library.
This could be very handy.. why cygwin's bc does not?
Problems specific to Cygwin or simply it is not default and no one felt
it necessary?
Lapo
--
Lapo Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it
