Re: coreutils-5.3.0-1

2005-01-31 Thread Eric Blake
announcement. Hmm, I found some packaging issues (maybe we should fold a variation of this check into the generic-build-script): $ tar tjvf coreutils-5.3.0-1.tar.bz2 | sed -e 's,.*usr/,/usr/,' -e 's, - .*,,' | grep -v '/$' | xargs cygcheck -fv | grep -v coreutils-5.2.1 /usr/bin/readlink.exe: found

Re: coreutils-5.3.0-1

2005-01-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
an announce posting to cygwin-announce. Don't forget to include the unsubscribe instructions in your announcement. Hmm, I found some packaging issues (maybe we should fold a variation of this check into the generic-build-script): $ tar tjvf coreutils-5.3.0-1.tar.bz2 | sed -e 's,.*usr

Re: coreutils-5.3.0-1

2005-01-31 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jan 29 11:05, Eric Blake wrote: I think I finally have something ready for submission on the coreutils front. Do I get the couple of gold stars promised in http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-01/msg00727.html? Absolutely. Igor, do

coreutils-5.3.0-1

2005-01-29 Thread Eric Blake
of the autotools) - I have not investigated any of the claimed regressions in nohup, such as http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-01/msg00651.html filesizemd5sum http://home.comcast.net/~ericblake/coreutils-5.3.0-1.tar.bz2 1960871 11201aa0da4392b470495a0a34a14362 http://home.comcast.net