If signatures are wanted, it seems sensible to me to also create ones
for source and binary package, not only inside the source package
itself: more useful for the security-savvy end-user, while the latter
are more useful for the advanced user that want to re-compile the
package itself.
These
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Lapo Luchini wrote:
If signatures are wanted, it seems sensible to me to also create ones
for source and binary package, not only inside the source package
itself: more useful for the security-savvy end-user, while the latter
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Lapo Luchini wrote:
If signatures are wanted, it seems sensible to me to also create ones
for source and binary package, not only inside the source package
itself: more useful for the security-savvy end-user, while the latter
are more useful for the advanced user that
Igor Peshansky wrote:
Also, I'm in the process of testing a new logging setup in the g-b-s. I
won't be able to apply your patch until that code stabilizes and is
checked in.
OK, warn me when it stabilizes and I re-submit (both) and with ChangeLog. =)
Lapo
