mktemp obsolete [was: Re: [GTG] Re: [ITA] tcp_wrappers]

2008-02-23 Thread Charles Wilson

Dr. Volker Zell wrote:

Charles did you forget about this ?

 o http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-02/msg00042.html

   This release obsoletes the mktemp package; you should upgrade both
   packages at the same time or do coreutils second, to ensure that you still
   have a mktemp program.


Um, no?

The mktemp package's setup.hint now specifies the _obsolete category. 
The package directory has been moved from release/mktemp/ to 
release/_obsolete/mktemp.


What's to do?

I thought about creating a new, empty package with an updated version 
number -- but it's too late now.  Once somebody has updated to the new 
coreutils, if they update using my new empty mktemp, then coreutils' 
mktemp.exe will be deleted. That's no good.


--
Chuck


Re: mktemp obsolete

2008-02-23 Thread Eric Blake

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

According to Charles Wilson on 2/23/2008 9:08 AM:
| The mktemp package's setup.hint now specifies the _obsolete category.
| The package directory has been moved from release/mktemp/ to
| release/_obsolete/mktemp.
|
| What's to do?
|
| I thought about creating a new, empty package with an updated version
| number -- but it's too late now.  Once somebody has updated to the new
| coreutils, if they update using my new empty mktemp, then coreutils'
| mktemp.exe will be deleted. That's no good.

I can bump the version number of coreutils if you want to bump the version
number of mktemp.  But I think we're okay leaving things as they are for
now - no one has complained.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHwEn684KuGfSFAYARAhpZAJkBazBNk6dfy5/QZ6VnQIcOUFZ/XwCeK7hh
n3vEYb1+lIq/NI1qxQShEy0=
=n1ZJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: mktemp obsolete

2008-02-23 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Eric Blake wrote:

 According to Charles Wilson on 2/23/2008 9:08 AM:
 | The mktemp package's setup.hint now specifies the _obsolete category.
 | The package directory has been moved from release/mktemp/ to
 | release/_obsolete/mktemp.
 |
 | What's to do?
 |
 | I thought about creating a new, empty package with an updated version
 | number -- but it's too late now.  Once somebody has updated to the new
 | coreutils, if they update using my new empty mktemp, then coreutils'
 | mktemp.exe will be deleted. That's no good.

 I can bump the version number of coreutils if you want to bump the version
 number of mktemp.  But I think we're okay leaving things as they are for
 now - no one has complained.

They won't complain until they try to uninstall mktemp and find their
coreutils incomplete...  That wouldn't be a very common situation (so no
rush), but it would be nice to do what you propose at some point.
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   old name: Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor.  That is the whole
Torah; the rest is commentary.  Go and study it. -- Rabbi Hillel


Re: mktemp obsolete

2008-02-23 Thread Charles Wilson

Igor Peshansky wrote:


They won't complain until they try to uninstall mktemp and find their
coreutils incomplete...  That wouldn't be a very common situation (so no
rush), but it would be nice to do what you propose at some point.


Well, the best time to do that is whenever coreutils is next updated. 
So, Eric, if you would please upload the two attached files into the 
proper place simultaneous with your next, regularly scheduled coreutils 
update, I'd be grateful.


--
Chuck



Re: mktemp obsolete

2008-02-23 Thread Charles Wilson

Charles Wilson wrote:

Igor Peshansky wrote:


They won't complain until they try to uninstall mktemp and find their
coreutils incomplete...  That wouldn't be a very common situation (so no
rush), but it would be nice to do what you propose at some point.


Well, the best time to do that is whenever coreutils is next updated. 
So, Eric, if you would please upload the two attached files into the 
proper place simultaneous with your next, regularly scheduled coreutils 
update, I'd be grateful.


Attached. blush

--
Chuck


mktemp-1.5-5-src.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data


mktemp-1.5-5.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data