On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
) OK, I've found the problem. Setup's integrated tar code is rather
) oversensitive to magic numbers. Specifically, your naim tarball does not
) contain ustar\040\040\0 at offset 257. Repacking with GNU tar is the short
) term fix. Long term, maybe
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK, I've found the problem. Setup's integrated tar code is rather
oversensitive to magic numbers. Specifically, your naim tarball does not
contain ustar\040\040\0 at offset 257. Repacking with GNU tar is the short
term fix. Long term, maybe setup could
Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
) OK, I've found the problem. Setup's integrated tar code is rather
) oversensitive to magic numbers. Specifically, your naim tarball does not
) contain ustar\040\040\0 at offset 257. Repacking with GNU tar is the
short
) term
On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) Any headway on this? I see naim's version listed as 0.11.5.9-cyg1-1 now,
) still get the same behaviour. Off the top of my head, I'm wondering if the
) symlinks in the tarball could be confusing something.
If I try
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) Any headway on this? I see naim's version listed as 0.11.5.9-cyg1-1 now,
) still get the same behaviour. Off the top of my head, I'm wondering if the
) symlinks in the tarball could
I noticed that the release directory from mirrors.rcn.net is empty just now.
Earnie.
Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-07-16T09:31+0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) Any headway on this? I see naim's version listed as 0.11.5.9-cyg1-1 now,
) still get the same behaviour. Off the top of my
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
@ naim
date : 25 Jun 2003
version: 0.11.5.9.cyg10-1
status : not reviewed
notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00234.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00280.html
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
@ naim
date : 25 Jun 2003
version: 0.11.5.9.cyg10-1
status : not reviewed
notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00234.html
On 2003-07-15T17:31+0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) url: http://shell.n.ml.org/n/naim/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2
) OK, the sun is shining, it's a lovely day..and I uploaded naim :-)
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-07-15T17:31+0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) url: http://shell.n.ml.org/n/naim/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2
) OK, the sun is shining,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-07-15T17:31+0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) url:
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-07-15T17:31+0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
) url:
http://shell.n.ml.org/n/naim/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2 )
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK, I have an incling that this is because of the package file names. I've
renamed the files, to see if setup will grok them.
It's not the names. That didn't seem right, and testing confirmed - same
failure mode when the version number is changed to
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK, I have an incling that this is because of the package file names. I've
renamed the files, to see if setup will grok them.
It's not the names. That didn't seem right, and testing confirmed - same
14 matches
Mail list logo
