===
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This explains it all! No need to worry ;)) Bad thing is I havent
looked at the
> Makefile.in first,
> but spent time looking at assembly shite ;)))
Thank you very much for this Pavel.
Rob
ris' response (AFAICT) implied that the size was not an
> issue,
> but cross-compilability was.
>
> Rob
>
>
> ===
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: S
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: RE: setup w/char* eliminated is big
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pavel Tsekov
> > Sent: Friday, Febr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pavel Tsekov
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:05 AM
>
> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > Ok,
> > finally got some breathing time.
> >
> > Setup with char * eliminated is ~350K. Ouch.
> >
> > This is why
Robert Collins wrote:
> Ok,
> finally got some breathing time.
>
> Setup with char * eliminated is ~350K. Ouch.
>
> This is why I've not committed my patch yet (I've been trying to see
> *where* the extra 100K appeared from).
You have four 'inline' - I know they're small in size, but three
===
- Original Message -
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Ok,
> > finally got some breathing time.
> >
> > Setup with char * eliminated is ~350K. Ouch.
> >
> > This is why I've not committed my patch yet (I've been trying to see
> > *where* the extra 100K appeared from
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Collins
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: setup w/char* eliminated is big
>
>
> Ok,
> finally got some breat
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 08:27:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>Please, no checkins to cinstall until this is sorted
>
>I have a bucketload in my sandbox - including that one! - and I don't
>want to face merge issues - which your commit is causing.
>
>So can you please back that commit out.
===
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: setup w/char* eliminated is big
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:02:54PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Oh
her Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: setup w/char* eliminated is big
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:42:28PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >*please* make sure that the '-' vs. '_' fix is
===
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:42 AM
Subject: Re: setup w/char* eliminated is big
> *please* make sure that t
===
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: setup w/char* eliminated is big
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:35:57PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >Ok,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:02:54PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Oh -- well, I guess I coulda done that too, but I don't like
>unilaterally messing with code in someone else's kingdom (but since
>you're the Grand High Emperor Moppet, it's okay for YOU). I know that
>Robert has had the fix in h
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:42:28PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>>*please* make sure that the '-' vs. '_' fix is in before releasing the
>>new setup. I've been sitting on the bzip2 update waiting on this...
>>
>>(Also, the localdir-is-on-remote-share fix would be
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:42:28PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>*please* make sure that the '-' vs. '_' fix is in before releasing the
>new setup. I've been sitting on the bzip2 update waiting on this...
>
>(Also, the localdir-is-on-remote-share fix would be nice, but it isn't
>as urgent as th
*please* make sure that the '-' vs. '_' fix is in before releasing the
new setup. I've been sitting on the bzip2 update waiting on this...
(Also, the localdir-is-on-remote-share fix would be nice, but it isn't
as urgent as the '_' thing.)
--Chuck
Robert Collins wrote:
> Ok,
> finally got
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:35:57PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>Ok,
> finally got some breathing time.
>
>Setup with char * eliminated is ~350K. Ouch.
>
>This is why I've not committed my patch yet (I've been trying to see
>*where* the extra 100K appeared from).
>
>Chris - is this a problem? IMO
Ok,
finally got some breathing time.
Setup with char * eliminated is ~350K. Ouch.
This is why I've not committed my patch yet (I've been trying to see
*where* the extra 100K appeared from).
Chris - is this a problem? IMO it's still a tiny fraction of the total
distribution size, and we're redu
18 matches
Mail list logo
