Re: Retiring setup.hint

2017-11-14 Thread Jon Turney
On 13/11/2017 19:59, Thomas Wolff wrote: Am 25.10.2017 um 21:42 schrieb Jon Turney: I propose that calm will stop accepting uploads containing setup.hint some time shortly after 2017-11-18. So, firstly this plan has been superseded... This is approximately one year after the cygport release

Re: Retiring setup.hint

2017-11-13 Thread Achim Gratz
Thomas Wolff writes: > If calm can simply "rename setup.hint to pvr.hint", what's the purpose > of all this? One of the purposes is that dependencies can and do change over time and eventually we will want to have separate dependencies for each released package like everybody else

Re: Retiring setup.hint

2017-11-13 Thread Thomas Wolff
Am 25.10.2017 um 21:42 schrieb Jon Turney: I propose that calm will stop accepting uploads containing setup.hint some time shortly after 2017-11-18. This is approximately one year after the cygport release [1] which, stopped generating these files, so if you're using cygport >= 0.2

Re: Retiring setup.hint

2017-11-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
; I propose that calm will stop accepting uploads containing setup.hint > > > > > some > > > > > time shortly after 2017-11-18. > > Better plan: when uploaded, calm will rename a setup.hint file to pvr.hint. > > (If the appropriate pvr cannot be determin

Re: Retiring setup.hint

2017-11-13 Thread Jon Turney
On 25/10/2017 22:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Oct 25 21:46, Jon Turney wrote: On 25/10/2017 21:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Oct 25 20:42, Jon Turney wrote: I propose that calm will stop accepting uploads containing setup.hint some time shortly after 2017-11-18. Better plan: when

Re: Retiring setup.hint

2017-10-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 25 21:46, Jon Turney wrote: > On 25/10/2017 21:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Oct 25 20:42, Jon Turney wrote: > > > > > > I propose that calm will stop accepting uploads containing setup.hint some > > > time shortly after 2017-11-18. > > >

Re: Retiring setup.hint

2017-10-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 25 20:42, Jon Turney wrote: > > I propose that calm will stop accepting uploads containing setup.hint some > time shortly after 2017-11-18. > > This is approximately one year after the cygport release [1] which, stopped > generating these files, so if you're using

Retiring setup.hint

2017-10-25 Thread Jon Turney
I propose that calm will stop accepting uploads containing setup.hint some time shortly after 2017-11-18. This is approximately one year after the cygport release [1] which, stopped generating these files, so if you're using cygport >= 0.23.0, no action is needed. Warnings that you n

Re: residual setup.hint

2017-04-07 Thread Jon Turney
in the last 3 months only cygwin, mintty and gcc packages where using setup.hint And probably they are all cross-compiled .. I deployed a small update to calm today: Unneeded setup.hint files will now be removed from the release area. Additionally, a warning telling you to upgrade cygport will now

Re: residual setup.hint

2017-04-05 Thread Marco Atzeri
packages where using setup.hint And probably they are all cross-compiled .. Regards Marco

Re: residual setup.hint

2017-04-05 Thread Jon Turney
On 05/04/2017 21:55, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 04/04/2017 19:38, Jon Turney wrote: On 04/04/2017 14:28, Marco Atzeri wrote: Not sure if "calm" is excluding them, but I noticed for some packages we have now an excess of "setup.hint" as all existing revision have their own

Re: residual setup.hint

2017-04-05 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 04/04/2017 19:38, Jon Turney wrote: On 04/04/2017 14:28, Marco Atzeri wrote: Not sure if "calm" is excluding them, but I noticed for some packages we have now an excess of "setup.hint" as all existing revision have their own package-revison.hint These old setup.hint fi

Re: residual setup.hint

2017-04-04 Thread Jon Turney
On 04/04/2017 14:28, Marco Atzeri wrote: Not sure if "calm" is excluding them, but I noticed for some packages we have now an excess of "setup.hint" as all existing revision have their own package-revison.hint These old setup.hint files should be benign, unless they are

residual setup.hint

2017-04-04 Thread Marco Atzeri
Hi, Not sure if "calm" is excluding them, but I noticed for same packages we have now an excess of "setup.hint" as all existing revision have their own package-revison.hint libopenssl100/ 26-Jan-2017 20:44

setup.hint

2016-10-11 Thread Marco Atzeri
Hi Jon, following our previous discussion about setup.hint transition. As Yaakov asked to rebuild mutt, that I just rebuild last week I have the problem of what to do of the current "setup.hint", as "calm" did not allow to remove last time. Current situation mutt-1.7.0-1-src

Re: [PATCH cygport] Write and upload pvr.hint rather than setup.hint

2016-09-16 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2016-09-01 12:12, Jon Turney wrote: On 30/08/2016 13:24, Jon Turney wrote: For a source-only package, rather than just a skip: key, write category:, requires:, ldesc: and sdesc: keys as well. This had a rather unfortunate bug which made it always generate a source-only package hint (i.e.

Re: [PATCH cygport] Write and upload pvr.hint rather than setup.hint

2016-09-01 Thread Jon Turney
rather than setup.hint For a source-only package, rather than just a skip: key, write category:, requires:, ldesc: and sdesc: keys as well. v2: Only generate a source-only package hint with skip: when nothing else has generated the package hint, rather than always Signed-off-by: Jon Turney &l

[PATCH cygport] Write and upload pvr.hint rather than setup.hint

2016-08-30 Thread Jon Turney
r more setup package categories. This will be -# used as the category: field of auto-generated setup.hint files. +# used as the category: field of auto-generated .hint files. # NOTE # A list of official categories is available on the # |html http://cygwin.com/setup.html#setup.hint;>Cygwi

Re: setup.hint documentation issues

2016-03-29 Thread Jon Turney
On 17/02/2016 14:23, Jon Turney wrote: On 09/02/2016 17:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 9 13:18, Jon Turney wrote: * 'sdesc' text is mangled in setup.ini (but not the HTML package list) In particular, it is forced to start with a capital letter (which is incorrect when the sdesc starts

Re: setup.hint documentation issues

2016-02-17 Thread Achim Gratz
regex. IN any case, that's not a problem we need to solve now. >> So the proposal is to remove skip or make it mandatory for source-only >> packages? > > I'm not sure. I think I tend towards removing it, since it doesn't > add any information. OK. > But currently cygport

Re: setup.hint documentation issues

2016-02-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 17 14:23, Jon Turney wrote: > On 09/02/2016 17:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >IMHO we don't need "skip". A source-only package should be > >automatically skipped anyway. What other reason do we need to ignore > >a package? > > Yes, this is why I ask the question. > > I don't see what

Re: setup.hint documentation issues

2016-02-17 Thread Jon Turney
On 09/02/2016 17:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 9 13:18, Jon Turney wrote: * 'sdesc' text is mangled in setup.ini (but not the HTML package list) In particular, it is forced to start with a capital letter (which is incorrect when the sdesc starts with a command name which is properly

Re: setup.hint documentation issues

2016-02-09 Thread Achim Gratz
Jon Turney writes: > I think currently UTF-8 displays correctly in the HTML package pages, > but neither encoding displays correctly in setup. > > I'd suggest that we specify UTF-8 and eventually fix setup to handle that. UTF-8 these days, please. > I'd suggest this mangling is removed, and

setup.hint documentation issues

2016-02-09 Thread Jon Turney
While I've been looking at replacement/improvement for the current upset script, I've come across some minor issues related to under-specification or under-documentation of setup.hint: * The encoding of setup.hint is unspecified. Historically both ISO-8859-1 and UTF-8 have been used. (e.g

Re: setup.hint documentation issues

2016-02-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 9 13:18, Jon Turney wrote: > > While I've been looking at replacement/improvement for the current upset > script, I've come across some minor issues related to under-specification or > under-documentation of setup.hint: > > * The encoding of setup.hint is unspecified.

Please fix your setup.hint files (was: [HEADSUP] requires to obsolete Perl packages)

2015-12-17 Thread Achim Gratz
There are a number of packages still requiring obsoleted Perl packages that I want to delete now, so these setup.hint files need to be fixed. Here is what I've found so far with a proposed replacement in parenthesis. perl_vendor (only on 32bit since it never existed on 64bit): === Yaakov

Re: Please fix your setup.hint files

2015-12-17 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: >> Remark: SWI Prolog doesn't compile from the source package. > > It did when I created it. Well, certainly. :-) > Yes, it's spurious. I removed the perl_vendor from setup.hint for now. > I don't intend to repackage SWI-Prolog for a while. Thanks

Re: Please fix your setup.hint files (was: [HEADSUP] requires to obsolete Perl packages)

2015-12-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 17 19:27, Achim Gratz wrote: > > There are a number of packages still requiring obsoleted Perl packages > that I want to delete now, so these setup.hint files need to be fixed. > Here is what I've found so far with a proposed replacement in > parenthesis. > > perl_

Re: setup.hint spelling/typo fixes

2015-10-23 Thread Achim Gratz
Jon Turney writes: > I fixed on cygwin.com various spelling errors or typos in setup.hint: […] > AG: perl-TimeDate: formating -> formatting That typo in the description is from upstream, it gets generated from the META information on CPAN. :-) http://api.metacpan.org/v0/release/Time

setup.hint spelling/typo fixes

2015-10-23 Thread Jon Turney
I fixed on cygwin.com various spelling errors or typos in setup.hint: Please update your local copy JA: apngdis: invividual -> individual YS: artikulate : pronounciation -> pronunciation YS: autoconf2.1: creattes -> creates JY: binutils: assember -> assembler MA: catdoc

Re: setup.hint spelling/typo fixes

2015-10-23 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 14:48 +0100, Jon Turney wrote: > I fixed on cygwin.com various spelling errors or typos in setup.hint: > > Please update your local copy Done, thanks! -- Yaakov

Re: upload just setup.hint?

2015-08-25 Thread Ken Brown
On 8/25/2015 7:37 AM, Andrew Schulman wrote: I have a package in test, that I want to promote to current. If I just upload the revised setup.hint and !ready, is that enough? Yes. Ken

upload just setup.hint?

2015-08-25 Thread Andrew Schulman
I have a package in test, that I want to promote to current. If I just upload the revised setup.hint and !ready, is that enough? Or do I need to re-upload the package .tar.xz files too, and/or bump the version number?

Re: cygport: allow setting prev:, curr:, and test: in autogenerated setup.hint

2015-06-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
quite so much. OTOH setting PREV, CURR and TEST feels a little more natural to me with the current 3-version setup. Either way would be fine with me, as long as I have a way of automatically setting the versions in the cygport file, instead of having to manually edit setup.hint after

Re: cygport: allow setting prev:, curr:, and test: in autogenerated setup.hint

2015-06-04 Thread Achim Gratz
Andrew Schulman writes: I have a package (socat) where I need to set the curr: and test: fields in setup.hint. I got tired of adding them to the autogenerated setup.hint files after every build, so I wrote a patch for cygport to support specifying them in the cygport file. For example

Re: cygport: allow setting prev:, curr:, and test: in autogenerated setup.hint

2015-06-04 Thread Andrew Schulman
a little more natural to me with the current 3-version setup. Either way would be fine with me, as long as I have a way of automatically setting the versions in the cygport file, instead of having to manually edit setup.hint after the build. Andrew

cygport: allow setting prev:, curr:, and test: in autogenerated setup.hint

2015-06-03 Thread Andrew Schulman
I have a package (socat) where I need to set the curr: and test: fields in setup.hint. I got tired of adding them to the autogenerated setup.hint files after every build, so I wrote a patch for cygport to support specifying them in the cygport file. For example, setting CURR=1.7.3.0-2 TEST

Re: cygport 0.17.0: Incorrect 'requires' line in setup.hint

2014-09-26 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 25/09/2014 22:05, David Stacey wrote: I am trying to package tinyxml2, to be used by cppcheck. I have split the package into a library package called 'libtinyxml2-2', and a devel package 'libtinyxml2-devel'. However, when I run cygport to generate the packages, the setup.hint file

Re: cygport 0.17.0: Incorrect 'requires' line in setup.hint

2014-09-26 Thread David Stacey
the packages, the setup.hint file for the devel package claims that it is dependent on 'libtinyxml2' (note the missing '-2' at the end). the package should be called libtinyxml2_2 That fixed it - thank you for your help. Cheers, Dave.

Do I need to upload setup.hint?

2014-01-05 Thread waterlan
Hi, In the web page that describes the new upload method there is no mention of setup.hint. Is it not required to upload setup.hint? How are requires, categories, and descriptions defined? -- Erwin Waterlander http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/

Re: Do I need to upload setup.hint?

2014-01-05 Thread marco atzeri
Il 1/5/2014 9:27 PM, waterlan ha scritto: Hi, In the web page that describes the new upload method there is no mention of setup.hint. Is it not required to upload setup.hint? How are requires, categories, and descriptions defined? setup.hint's are need, of course as they are the base

Re: Do I need to upload setup.hint?

2014-01-05 Thread waterlan
marco atzeri schreef op 2014-01-05 21:48: Il 1/5/2014 9:27 PM, waterlan ha scritto: Hi, In the web page that describes the new upload method there is no mention of setup.hint. Is it not required to upload setup.hint? How are requires, categories, and descriptions defined? setup.hint's

Re: Do I need to upload setup.hint?

2014-01-05 Thread marco atzeri
Il 1/5/2014 9:52 PM, waterlan ha scritto: marco atzeri schreef op 2014-01-05 21:48: Il 1/5/2014 9:27 PM, waterlan ha scritto: Hi, In the web page that describes the new upload method there is no mention of setup.hint. Is it not required to upload setup.hint? How are requires, categories

pcre: setup.hint

2013-10-07 Thread Achim Gratz
The pcre directory has a setup.hint with just skip: as the only entry. This would indicate a source-only package, however pcre does have a package with documentation and binaries that can't be installed due to this. Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk

Re: pcre: setup.hint

2013-10-07 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-10-07 13:03, Achim Gratz wrote: The pcre directory has a setup.hint with just skip: as the only entry. This would indicate a source-only package, however pcre does have a package with documentation and binaries that can't be installed due to this. Fixed, thanks for noticing. Yaakov

Correct cyggcc_s-seh-1.dll dependency in setup.hint (64bit)?

2013-09-15 Thread Jari Aalto
Some of the *.exe files I compile under 64 report dependencies like this: ... C:\tmp\cygwin\root\bin\cygz.dll C:\tmp\cygwin\root\bin\cygstdc++-6.dll C:\tmp\cygwin\root\bin\cyggcc_s-seh-1.dll The first two are obvious, but what is the last one? What requires: should I put in setup.hint

Re: Correct cyggcc_s-seh-1.dll dependency in setup.hint (64bit)?

2013-09-15 Thread Achim Gratz
Jari Aalto writes: C:\tmp\cygwin\root\bin\cyggcc_s-seh-1.dll The first two are obvious, but what is the last one? What requires: should I put in setup.hint to satisfy it? Asking the orcale at: http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cyggcc_s-seh-1.dllarch=x86_64 gives the answer

64bit : missing setup.hint

2013-03-22 Thread marco atzeri
I noticed on the 64 bit tree that the following files base-cygwin-3.2-1.tar.bz2 gzip-1.4-1.tar.bz2 winsup-20130314-svn-1.tar.bz2 are missing the relevant setup.hint Regards Marco

Re: 64bit : missing setup.hint

2013-03-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 22 11:30, marco atzeri wrote: I noticed on the 64 bit tree that the following files base-cygwin-3.2-1.tar.bz2 gzip-1.4-1.tar.bz2 winsup-20130314-svn-1.tar.bz2 are missing the relevant setup.hint Thanks for the hint. I added these files. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen

Re: RFU: apngtools setup.hint

2012-10-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 23 07:38, Jari Aalto wrote: Please upload this apngtools metapackage for users that want to get all in download. wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/apngtools/setup.hint \ I would love to, but it looks like there's

Re: RFU: apngtools setup.hint

2012-10-23 Thread Jari Aalto
On 2012-10-23 09:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote: | I would love to, but it looks like there's something amiss here... ;) Extra backslash removed from URL and commas from setup.hint::required field: wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin

Re: RFU: apngtools setup.hint

2012-10-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 23 16:24, Jari Aalto wrote: On 2012-10-23 09:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote: | I would love to, but it looks like there's something amiss here... ;) Extra backslash removed from URL and commas from setup.hint::required field: wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3

Re: RFU: apngtools setup.hint

2012-10-23 Thread Jari Aalto
2012-10-23 16:43 Corinna Vinschen | I think we need empty apngtools bin and src packages as well. Just | a setup.hint file seems a bit on the lean side. Ok. Created an empty package for the effect of setup.hint only. wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ http://cante.net

RFU: apngtools setup.hint

2012-10-22 Thread Jari Aalto
Please upload this apngtools metapackage for users that want to get all in download. wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/apngtools/setup.hint \ Jari [ setup.hint ] sdesc: Animated PNG image (APNG) tools ldesc: Collection

ITP: apngtools setup.hint (Was: ITP waiting list)

2012-10-20 Thread Jari Aalto
apng tools package ? The compilations can be handled through metapackages that depend on individual packages[*]. See Ubuntu etc. After RFU'ing these, we can upload: wget --recursive --no-host-directories --cut-dirs=3 \ http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/apngtools/setup.hint \ Jari

Re: cygport: check setup.hint?

2012-09-10 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/20/2012 5:20 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 7/20/2012 3:27 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2012-07-20 11:19, Ken Brown wrote: 1. The setup.hint generated for emacs (but not emacs-X11) erroneously listed perl and python in the requires. I'm attaching my .cygport file and the associated patches

Re: cygport: check setup.hint?

2012-09-10 Thread Achim Gratz
Ken Brown writes: How about something like [PKG_]REQUIRE_EXCLUDES for packages that we don't want to require? Any further thoughts about this? +1 Since I have made a snapshot package, cygport picks up that package as a dependency. I've patched pkg.cygpart to filter these out (grep -Ev

Re: cygport: check setup.hint?

2012-07-20 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-07-19 00:22, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2012-07-18 06:53, Ken Brown wrote: When I build a package using cygport, I sometimes forget to run cygport's dep command to make sure my setup.hint is up to date. I think it would be useful for cygport to do this as part of its packaging step

Re: cygport: check setup.hint?

2012-07-20 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/20/2012 8:35 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2012-07-19 00:22, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2012-07-18 06:53, Ken Brown wrote: When I build a package using cygport, I sometimes forget to run cygport's dep command to make sure my setup.hint is up to date. I think it would be useful

Re: cygport: check setup.hint?

2012-07-20 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
, that was fast. Thanks! I was already working on the setup.hint generation earlier this week; I just had to add in the dependency generation, the framework for which was there already in __list_deps (although I added to it). That being said, it came together even faster than I had anticipated. I

Re: cygport: check setup.hint?

2012-07-20 Thread Ken Brown
to remove your .hint files from $C. Wow, that was fast. Thanks! I was already working on the setup.hint generation earlier this week; I just had to add in the dependency generation, the framework for which was there already in __list_deps (although I added to it). That being said, it came

cygport: check setup.hint?

2012-07-18 Thread Ken Brown
When I build a package using cygport, I sometimes forget to run cygport's dep command to make sure my setup.hint is up to date. I think it would be useful for cygport to do this as part of its packaging step. It could print out a list of dependencies or, better, print a warning

Re: cygport: check setup.hint?

2012-07-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2012-07-18 06:53, Ken Brown wrote: When I build a package using cygport, I sometimes forget to run cygport's dep command to make sure my setup.hint is up to date. I think it would be useful for cygport to do this as part of its packaging step. It could print out a list of dependencies

octave setup.hint error

2011-09-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
upset: Error. Parsing failed. - release/octave/setup.hint(9): can't use [] here I've changed octave's setup.hints to add prev:, curr:, test: lines, removing the incorrect setup.ini format.

Re: octave setup.hint error

2011-09-21 Thread Marco atzeri
On 9/21/2011 4:02 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: upset: Error. Parsing failed. - release/octave/setup.hint(9): can't use [] here I've changed octave's setup.hints to add prev:, curr:, test: lines, removing the incorrect setup.ini format. I wrongly copied the setup.ini structure instead

[RFU] New setup.hint files for emacs, emacs-X11, and emacs-el

2011-04-19 Thread Ken Brown
I'd like to promote the test releases (23.3-2) to current. I think the following setup.hint files should do the job. wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ http://www.math.cornell.edu/~kbrown/cygwin/emacs/setup.hint \ http://www.math.cornell.edu/~kbrown/cygwin/emacs/emacs-X11/setup.hint \ http

Re: [RFU] New setup.hint files for emacs, emacs-X11, and emacs-el

2011-04-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 04:56:05PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: I'd like to promote the test releases (23.3-2) to current. I think the following setup.hint files should do the job. wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \ http://www.math.cornell.edu/~kbrown/cygwin/emacs/setup.hint \ http

Re: Ooops, minor setup.hint glitch - and announce list bouncing my posts

2011-03-23 Thread Dave Korn
On 22/03/2011 21:45, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:16:58PM +, Dave Korn wrote: Also, I can't post the release announcement, because the spam filter complains that I have things that look like raw email addresses in the body. Mailing the global allow address didn't

Ooops, minor setup.hint glitch - and announce list bouncing my posts

2011-03-22 Thread Dave Korn
Hi folks, I just uploaded gcc4-4.3.4-4, and realised the setup.hint requires: lines don't reflect the extra dependencies that 4.5.0-1 requires. There will be a brief window while I fix this when anyone installing 4.5.0 might not get all the libs like MPC GMP etc. that they need. Also

Re: Ooops, minor setup.hint glitch - and announce list bouncing my posts

2011-03-22 Thread Dave Korn
On 22/03/2011 21:16, Dave Korn wrote: I just uploaded gcc4-4.3.4-4, and realised the setup.hint requires: lines don't reflect the extra dependencies that 4.5.0-1 requires. There will be a brief window while I fix this when anyone installing 4.5.0 might not get all the libs like MPC GMP etc

Re: Ooops, minor setup.hint glitch - and announce list bouncing my posts

2011-03-22 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/22/2011 5:19 PM, Dave Korn wrote: Guess I forgot to actually ask: Do we prefer the situation where all users of curr: packages get a few extra libs that they don't need, or would we prefer not to make them download extra libs and rely on users of test: packages to manually download

Re: Ooops, minor setup.hint glitch - and announce list bouncing my posts

2011-03-22 Thread Dave Korn
On 22/03/2011 21:44, Charles Wilson wrote: On 3/22/2011 5:19 PM, Dave Korn wrote: Guess I forgot to actually ask: Do we prefer the situation where all users of curr: packages get a few extra libs that they don't need, or would we prefer not to make them download extra libs and rely on users

Re: Ooops, minor setup.hint glitch - and announce list bouncing my posts

2011-03-22 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:16:58PM +, Dave Korn wrote: Also, I can't post the release announcement, because the spam filter complains that I have things that look like raw email addresses in the body. Mailing the global allow address didn't help - can anyone get it through manually? Looking

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 24 18:23, Charles Wilson wrote: On 6/24/2010 5:02 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Do you know yet what the actual DLL names are going to be? libkio dlopen()s these instead of linking against them, so I want to fix these for my next KDE release. [...] (obviously those last two would

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 24 23:21, Matthias Andree wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote on 2010-06-24: On Jun 24 20:13, Matthias Andree wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote on 2010-06-24: I have no idea about this stuff. I'm maintaining openssl primarily since it's required for openssh. If there's anything which isn't

HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Corinna Vinschen
this in the setup.hint files on cygwin.com, but, please do this in your local copy of your setup.hint files as well. As soon as I upgraded to openssl-1.0.0a-1, make sure that you keep your package dependencies in shape when building a new package. That means to change from libopenssl098

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Andrew Schulman
So, what we have to do is to convert *ALL* existing package dependencies from openssl to libopenssl098. I'm going to do this in the setup.hint files on cygwin.com, but, please do this in your local copy of your setup.hint files as well. Done.

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Matthias Andree
Corinna Vinschen wrote on 2010-06-24: Hi guys, according to the discussion starting here http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2010-06/msg00101.html the layout of the openssl package has changed so that the runtime libraries are now in the libopenssl098 package, rather than in the openssl base

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 24 15:55, Matthias Andree wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote on 2010-06-24: Hi guys, according to the discussion starting here http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2010-06/msg00101.html the layout of the openssl package has changed so that the runtime libraries are now in the libopenssl098

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Matthias Andree
Corinna Vinschen wrote on 2010-06-24: On Jun 24 15:55, Matthias Andree wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote on 2010-06-24: Hi guys, according to the discussion starting here http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2010-06/msg00101.html the layout of the openssl package has changed so that the runtime

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 24 20:13, Matthias Andree wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote on 2010-06-24: I have no idea about this stuff. I'm maintaining openssl primarily since it's required for openssh. If there's anything which isn't fixed upstream, it won't be fixed for Cygwin. The Cygwin 1.0.0a-1 package is

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:41 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Openssl does not come with any certificate and there's no certificate package in Cygwin either. AFAICS it would be sufficient to move to another ssl directory like, say, /usr/share/ssl instead of /usr/ssl. The user can copy and rehash

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 24 14:55, Yaakov S wrote: On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:41 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Openssl does not come with any certificate and there's no certificate package in Cygwin either. AFAICS it would be sufficient to move to another ssl directory like, say, /usr/share/ssl instead of

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 22:25 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Openssl's configuration only allows two location options, --prefix, which is set to /usr, and --openssldir, which is set to /usr/ssl by default. So, if we change --openssldir to /usr/share/ssl, all files will move there, including the

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:36 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: So, what we have to do is to convert *ALL* existing package dependencies from openssl to libopenssl098. I'm going to do this in the setup.hint files on cygwin.com, but, please do this in your local copy of your setup.hint files

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Matthias Andree
Corinna Vinschen wrote on 2010-06-24: On Jun 24 20:13, Matthias Andree wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote on 2010-06-24: I have no idea about this stuff. I'm maintaining openssl primarily since it's required for openssh. If there's anything which isn't fixed upstream, it won't be fixed for

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/24/2010 5:02 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Do you know yet what the actual DLL names are going to be? libkio dlopen()s these instead of linking against them, so I want to fix these for my next KDE release. When I built it for (a cygwin fork that shall not be named), they were:

Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Change in openssl package requires change in setup.hint

2010-06-24 Thread Gareth Pearce
On 25/06/2010 7:02 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:36 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: So, what we have to do is to convert *ALL* existing package dependencies from openssl to libopenssl098. I'm going to do this in the setup.hint files on cygwin.com, but, please do

[RFU] orpie setup.hint

2010-01-21 Thread Andrew Schulman
Please re-upload the setup.hint for orpie. I've relaxed the dependency on lapack to just liblapack0, which will avoid lapack's repeated reinstallation problem in setup. Thanks, Andrew. wget http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/orpie/setup.hint

Re: [RFU] orpie setup.hint

2010-01-21 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 21 07:59, Andrew Schulman wrote: Please re-upload the setup.hint for orpie. I've relaxed the dependency on lapack to just liblapack0, which will avoid lapack's repeated reinstallation problem in setup. Thanks, Andrew. wget http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/orpie/setup.hint

Re: perl setup.hint changed

2009-12-27 Thread Reini Urban
2009/12/27 Christopher Faylor: - Forwarded message from Ivanyi Peter - I just fixed the wrong setup.hint yesterday, so it could be that you got a broken setup.hint with no dependencies at all. You need those packages: libgcc1 libgdbm4 libdb4.5 crypt libexpat1 libbz2_1

perl setup.hint changed

2009-12-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
- Forwarded message from Ivanyi Peter - I just fixed the wrong setup.hint yesterday, so it could be that you got a broken setup.hint with no dependencies at all. You need those packages: libgcc1 libgdbm4 libdb4.5 crypt libexpat1 libbz2_1 shows that cygssp-0.dll

More setup.hint font adjustments

2009-09-30 Thread Jon TURNEY
I've adjusted the setup.hint for a few packages to more accurately reflect the fonts they require, notes on which I've been collecting at [1] xedit: remove dependency on dpi100 versions of several font packages xman: change to depend on dpi75 not dpi100 versions of font-adobe and font-bh gvim

[RFU] screen setup.hint

2009-09-30 Thread Andrew Schulman
I'm promoting the current test versions of screen to current. Please upload the revised setup.hints (below) to make the change. All I've done is to remove the test: and curr: lines from each setup.hint. Thanks, Andrew. # 1.5 wget http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/1.5/screen/setup.hint

Re: [RFU] screen setup.hint

2009-09-30 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 30/09/2009 10:56, Andrew Schulman wrote: I'm promoting the current test versions of screen to current. Please upload the revised setup.hints (below) to make the change. All I've done is to remove the test: and curr: lines from each setup.hint. Thanks, Done. Yaakov

[RFU] lftp setup.hint

2009-07-21 Thread Andrew Schulman
Please upload revised setup.hint files, below, for lftp for Cygwin 1.5 and 1.7. The previous setup.hints were missing some package dependencies. For people whose lftp installations are broken because they didn't get all of the necessary dependencies when they installed lftp the first time

Re: [RFU] lftp setup.hint

2009-07-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:14:47PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: Please upload revised setup.hint files, below, for lftp for Cygwin 1.5 and 1.7. The previous setup.hints were missing some package dependencies. For people whose lftp installations are broken because they didn't get all

Re: [RFU] lftp setup.hint

2009-07-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:39:52PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:14:47PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: Please upload revised setup.hint files, below, for lftp for Cygwin 1.5 and 1.7. The previous setup.hints were missing some package dependencies. For people whose

Re: [RFU] lftp setup.hint

2009-07-21 Thread Andrew Schulman
# 1.5 wget http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/1.5/lftp/setup.hint Btw, this has a dependency on libreadline7. I changed it to libreadline6 since that is the newest package available for 1.5. Right, thanks.

xterm setup.hint adjustment

2009-06-30 Thread Jon TURNEY
Following [1] and other previous difficulties, I've added 'font-misc-misc font-adobe-dpi75 font-alias' to the 'requires:' for xterm This should be the minimal set of additions that xterm now starts up free of warnings [1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2009-06/msg00067.html

  1   2   3   >