Re: Has anyone reviewed the cygwin-xfree packages?

2002-04-16 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't have X installed, so I thought I'd give it a try. But the site that was posted didn't have any actual packages, just the setup.ini and setup.hint files, so the install failed. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:22:52PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: Yes, please post the setup.hint files that you used. Check out http://www.znark.com/cygwin/. It doesn't include the archive files; my web account doesn't have the bandwidth or quota for them. To generate

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-16 Thread Charles Wilson
I can do this -- but what was the outcome of the package name argument? Was it xfree-foo-4.2.0-1.tar.bz2 or xfree86-... or XFree86-...? I'll need to modify the znark script accordingly. --Chuck Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:22:52PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-11 Thread Ian Burrell
Harold Hunt wrote: That sounds fine. Can I also request that you use a seperate variable for the server version number? I'd ask that because the server will tend to get updated often while most of the other packages will never be updated. I'm really looking forward to these packages

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AFAICT, both Red Hat and Debian allow upper/lower case, so there's no reason for us to restrict things. All Debian packages are lower case, of course. TAB completion is a silly argument against using mixed case, but I just couldn't imagine anyone

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:27:14PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: Ian, Chris wants the setup hint files IN the mailing list archive permanently. Not sitting on an external, subject-to-change website. I've pasted them here. These look ok except the version: field is a no-op in setup.hint and

RE: xfree packages

2002-04-10 Thread Robert Collins
Setup is case insensitive to package names. I don't see any technical issue either way. Rob

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-10 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Setup is case insensitive to package names. I don't see any technical issue either way. Me neither, I only see a social issue: it's just plain irritating for people? tar xjf releases/mysTABTAB beep ^U tar xjf releases/MyTABTAB beep ^U etc,

RE: xfree packages

2002-04-10 Thread Harold Hunt
] Subject: Re: xfree packages On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:46PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote: I finished making some xfree packages. They are distributed binary archives repackaged as cygwin packages. I made a package directory that can be used with setup.exe from a local directory and over

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-10 Thread Earnie Boyd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: xfree packages On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:46PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote: I finished making some xfree packages. They are distributed binary archives repackaged as cygwin packages. I made a package directory that can be used

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:27:14PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: Ian, Chris wants the setup hint files IN the mailing list archive permanently. Not sitting on an external, subject-to-change website. Right. This is part of the process for getting a package into the cygwin package distribution.

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-10 Thread Ian Burrell
Harold Hunt wrote: Yes, we try to keep things regularized around here, so XFree86 is the way that the package names need to be spelled. Also, I request that you keep the XFree86-xserv package, as that will allow us to realize the immediate benefit of being able to release the Test-**

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:47:31AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Setup is case insensitive to package names. I don't see any technical issue either way. Me neither, I only see a social issue: it's just plain irritating for people? tar xjf

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-10 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
At 08:29 PM 4/10/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:47:31AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Setup is case insensitive to package names. I don't see any technical issue either way. Me neither, I only see a social issue:

xfree packages

2002-04-09 Thread Ian Burrell
I finished making some xfree packages. They are distributed binary archives repackaged as cygwin packages. I made a package directory that can be used with setup.exe from a local directory and over the network. I changed my mind about the division of the packages I proposed. I got rid

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:46PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote: I finished making some xfree packages. They are distributed binary archives repackaged as cygwin packages. I made a package directory that can be used with setup.exe from a local directory and over the network. I changed my mind