how far are we from including the latest package build?! -- There have
been no additional comments on the latest build in the list.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:45:40AM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Not sure if mutt works or not yet, I don't know if I can find a pops:// to pop
Please look through the sources and search for a ssl version request
as described in my original mail.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 06:14:09PM -0800, Joshua Franklin wrote:
Well, I've attached the patch in case anyone is
interested. It changes cygpath.exe to include the
options:
-A|--allusers use `All Users' directories
instead of current user
-D|--desktop print `Desktop'
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 12:25:35PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 12:17:28PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:57:38AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
how far are we from including the latest package build?! -- There have
Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit package.
What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone else's
package? Technically it's no problem...
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
Subject: RE: last package
Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit
Cool. I'm not too sure which category is appropriate. I thought possibly
either Base or Utils.
sdesc: last
ldesc: This utility searches through historical information kept in
/var/log/wtmp to determine who logged in, where they came from, when they
logged in, and how long they stayed.
I'll take a look at it.
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: last package
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at
===
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: last package
Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From:
Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Bradshaw
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: last package
I'll take a look at it.
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL
Just a heads up,
the current setup gets trapped in an endless loop if it can't install
a filewhich is locked. E.g. a running sshd results in the following
loop (GDB output):
warning: LOG: 0 Unable to install file cygfile:///usr/sbin/sshd.exe
warning: LOG: 1 Installing file
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 12:39:39PM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. I downloaded and installed your update, and
tested, and curl still works, with no recompile needed. However, curl
outputs the openssl version as part of its --version output, and it
still says openssl
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done.
It doesn't matter. If you don't like to port it, just
forget it. I just thought it would be a good idea to
borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
I don't mind. It's already done, actually. Now I'm eyeing up their version
of killall too.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:47 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: last package
On Tue, Jan 15,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:18:25AM -0800, Joshua Franklin wrote:
Thanks for the patch. I applied it to my local
sandbox but I
was somewhat surprised about the behaviour since
cygpath -D -A
has another result as
cygpath -A -D
which is not what a user expects. The
Yes, I checked an actual SSL connection. It actually worked ;-)
There's no call anywhere in the source to SSLeay or SSLeay_version.
There are some references to the value of both SSLEAY_VERSION_NUMBER and
OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER. It's not assigned (set) anywhere in curl's code,
just used. I do
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 07:38:34PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
And a question: Wouldn't it make sense to uninstall first on
Reinstall, too?
It doesn't do this already? Hmm. I would expect a reinstall to
be equivalent to an uninstall/install, yes.
cgf
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:41:19PM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 07:38:34PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
And a question: Wouldn't it make sense to uninstall first on
Reinstall, too?
It doesn't do this already? Hmm. I would expect a reinstall to
be equivalent to an
How big are they? If they are only a single .c file each (killall.c,
utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the
cygutils package, if you'd prefer./.
One of these days I'll get around to creating a sourceware-based CVS
tree for cygutils...Chris, how do I do that?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:10:29PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
How big are they? If they are only a single .c file each (killall.c,
utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the
cygutils package, if you'd prefer./.
One of these days I'll get around to creating a
Mark Bradshaw wrote:
Very small. All source combined is 33KB. Executables are 23.5KB. This is
just last and utmpdump.
You want 'em?
Dunno yet. I'm not really concerned about # kilobytes. My rule for
cygutils is one .c file per application -- I want to limit cygutils to
very
Thanks, I'll handle it.
Rob
===
- Original Message -
From: Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygapp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:40 AM
Subject: Current setup hangs if file can't get installed
Just a heads up,
the current setup gets trapped in an endless
On Tuesday 15 Jan 02, Ken Stevens writes:
What are the chances of getting emacs or xemacs as part of the setup?
GNU Emacs is not ported to Cygwin.
Xemacs may be a candidate. Andy Piper essentially forked an early
setup.exe so he could provide a pre-compiled Cygwin Xemacs package.
(I think his
Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
Yes, I checked an actual SSL connection. It actually worked ;-)
There's no call anywhere in the source to SSLeay or SSLeay_version.
There are some references to the value of both SSLEAY_VERSION_NUMBER and
OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER. It's not assigned (set) anywhere in
I've updated the wget package to version 1.7.1. I didn't follow all the
discussions about packaging structure so if a kind soul would check that
I haven't overlooked anything it would be apreciated 8-)
I've added a postinstall script to update the info dir file is the a way
to update it too
It looks pretty good to me -- I rebuilt it from source right now and it
seems okay. The *only* quibble I have is that the binary package
contains this file:
/etc/wgetrc
Since it is just a copy of /usr/doc/wget-1.7.1/sample.wgetrc, you should
probably just add some logic to your postinstall
Charles:
OK. Scratch killall. I didn't realize it used /proc. :o( Anyway,
what do you want for last and utmpdump.
Anyone else:
Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have
plans that direction?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Bradshaw
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Starks-Browning
This is not *the* Ken Stevens, is it?
The guy that did Wild World and Peace Train? Those ROCK dude!
Oh wait, that was Ken Burns. Nevermind.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hack Kampbjørn
Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
Yes, I checked an actual SSL connection. It actually worked ;-)
[snip]
So I'm the last one to report back.
AHEM! I believe that would be Second to last my
29 matches
Mail list logo
