Re: new cygwin package: gsl

2002-05-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:55:22PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
 
 
 Teun Burgers wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 I've uploaded binary and source packages of GSL,
 homepage www.fsf.org/software/gsl/
 These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs:
 
 http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2
 http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1.tar.bz2
 
 
 Packaging looks okay to me.  For later releases, you might think about 
 re-enabling the libtool shared library support.  But for now, the static 
 lib is great.

Could you upload the package, Charles?

Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.



Re: new cygwin package: gsl

2002-05-16 Thread Charles Wilson

Corinna Vinschen wrote:


Packaging looks okay to me.  For later releases, you might think about 
re-enabling the libtool shared library support.  But for now, the static 
lib is great.

 
 Could you upload the package, Charles?

Well, I said *packaging* looks okay.  However, I object to the setup.hint:

category: Devel
requires:
sdesc:the GNU Scientific Library
ldesc:the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical
routines for scientific computing.

This is not a development tool.  It's a library.  The category should be 
Libs.  And, it's a binary not a script, so it requires cygwin.  If Teun 
makes those changes, then sure, I'll upload...

--Chuck




Re: new cygwin package: gsl

2002-05-16 Thread Teun Burgers

Charles Wilson wrote:

 Well, I said *packaging* looks okay.  However, I object to the setup.hint:
 
 category: Devel
 requires:
 sdesc:the GNU Scientific Library
 ldesc:the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical
 routines for scientific computing.
 
 This is not a development tool.  It's a library.  The category should be 
 Libs.  And, it's a binary not a script, so it requires cygwin.  If Teun 
 makes those changes, then sure, I'll upload...

I think this only affects the source package. I uploaded a new version
of that.
(You might have to reload the URL in order to avoid looking at a cached
copy)

http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2

This is the new setup.hint:

category: Libs
requires: cygwin
sdesc:the GNU Scientific Library
ldesc:the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical
routines for scientific computing.


Teun



Re: new cygwin package: gsl

2002-05-16 Thread Charles Wilson

Teun Burgers wrote:

 I think this only affects the source package. I uploaded a new version
 of that.
 (You might have to reload the URL in order to avoid looking at a cached
 copy)
 
 http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2
 
 This is the new setup.hint:
 
 category: Libs
 requires: cygwin
 sdesc:the GNU Scientific Library
 ldesc:the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical
 routines for scientific computing.


thanks.  uploaded -- please wait 24 hours or so, and then send an 
announcement to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.  See 
http://cygwin.com/setup.html for information on how to format that message.

--Chuck





Re: new cygwin package: gsl

2002-05-15 Thread Charles Wilson



Teun Burgers wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I've uploaded binary and source packages of GSL,
 homepage www.fsf.org/software/gsl/
 These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs:
 
 http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2
 http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1.tar.bz2


Packaging looks okay to me.  For later releases, you might think about 
re-enabling the libtool shared library support.  But for now, the static 
lib is great.

--Chuck


 
 The tarballs were prepared with generic-build-script.sh.
 Here is the setup.hint:
 
 category: Devel
 requires:
 sdesc:the GNU Scientific Library
 ldesc:the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical
 routines for scientific computing.