On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:14:28PM -0600, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
Image: you click on 'install' for 'gcc', and up pops a window
that lists
everything that gcc depends on (both requires as we have today, and
'suggested' items that aren't always needed but are useful - ie
autoconf), that was
wrote:
As for the 's, I wonder if it's a w32api reference issue? The compiler
complains if they are present for me.
For me it is the opposite. g++ complains when they are *not*
present.
I believe this might be related to the above discussion so I thought I would
add this - I
I was thinking about writing some updated documentation as requested
lately on the mailing list
(http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-03/msg01633.html)
I've started by writing a new file to document the existance of the
cygwin_stackdump() function. ChangeLog:
2001-04-03 Joshua Daniel Franklin
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:39:51PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I was thinking about writing some updated documentation as requested
lately on the mailing list
(http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-03/msg01633.html)
I've started by writing a new file to document the existance of the
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:18:11PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
2) The patch is included is an html attachment.
Obviously 1) is a no-op but we really need just a straight patch in
regular text.
Well, I'm not sure this is what you mean, here is the straight text of the
file.
I'm
Likewise, if you click ash off, up pops a window listing everything
that depends on ash, with an addiotnal message of Warning: removing
ash will cause these packages to be removed as well.
This does make quite a bit of sense to me. But wouldn't MessageBox()
or something akin to it be a
