Solves the segfault here: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-09/msg00397.html
but does not address the fact that we are still screwy with regards to
rlimit.
==
Ultimately, based on my understanding of POSIX and glibc, my goal is to
have a number of changes (this patch only scratches the surface;
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Paul Kunysch wrote:
>> That looks like a reasonable fix. Did you trace through all of the
>> callers of semaphore::_getvalue to make sure that some of them aren't
>> relying on the old behavior?
>
>I did not look for other callers.
>
>I just wrote a very s
That looks like a reasonable fix. Did you trace through all of the
callers of semaphore::_getvalue to make sure that some of them aren't
relying on the old behavior?
I did not look for other callers.
I just wrote a very simple test for sem_getvalue() and copied different
cygwin1.dll versions