On Apr 4 01:25, Takashi Yano wrote:
> - After 24 bit color support patch, arrow keys and function keys
> do not work properly in native console applications if they
> are started in cygwin console. This patch fixes this issue.
> ---
> winsup/cygwin/fhandler_console.cc | 17 +
- After 24 bit color support patch, arrow keys and function keys
do not work properly in native console applications if they
are started in cygwin console. This patch fixes this issue.
---
winsup/cygwin/fhandler_console.cc | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git
Hi Corinna,
I have made a patch for the issue reported in cygwin-developers
mailing list as follows.
Could you please check?
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:27:58 +0200 Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 3 09:18, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> > > - cmd history works
> > In the cygwin console, it does not, echos
On 4/3/2019 8:33 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>> OK, a bit more info: The whole thing runs from a perl script (actually a
>> module) that opens pipes to gnuplot and ghostscript. This code is
>> _really_ old and has seen a lot of Cygwin releases, so it has options to
>> either use
Achim Gratz writes:
> OK, a bit more info: The whole thing runs from a perl script (actually a
> module) that opens pipes to gnuplot and ghostscript. This code is
> _really_ old and has seen a lot of Cygwin releases, so it has options to
> either use temporary files, named pipes aka FIFO or
Michael Haubenwallner writes:
> Before I really can tell what I need regarding the rebase, I need to learn
> what
> exactly is recorded into the rebase database, and probably how the recorded
> data
> does influence the rebase procedure right now.
Just where the DLL resides in the filesystem,
On Apr 3 12:38, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Furthermore, with so called "Stacked Prefix", it is possible to have a second
> level of Gentoo Prefix, so what I'm after is some option to tell the rebase
> utility which database to record dll base addresses into, and which
> multiple(!)
>
On Apr 3 11:18, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On 4/1/19 5:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Apr 1 16:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Apr 1 16:28, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> >>> On 3/28/19 9:30 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> can you please collect the base addresses of all DLLs
Hi Brian, hi Achim,
Thanks a lot for your input!
On 3/30/19 5:09 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2019-03-30 02:22, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Brian Inglis writes:
>>> On 2019-03-29 14:23, Achim Gratz wrote:
Brian Inglis writes:
>> If you are packaging your own exes and dlls with your own local
On 4/1/19 5:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 1 16:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Apr 1 16:28, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>>> On 3/28/19 9:30 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
can you please collect the base addresses of all DLLs generated during
the build, plus their size and
10 matches
Mail list logo
