[PATCH v2] fhandler_proc.cc(format_proc_cpuinfo): fix issues, add fields, flags

2019-10-05 Thread Brian Inglis
fix cache size return code handling and make AMD/Intel code common; fix cpuid level count as number of non-zero leafs excluding sub-leafs; fix AMD physical cores count to be documented nc + 1; round cpu MHz to correct Windows and match Linux cpuinfo; add microcode from Windows registry Update

Re: [PATCH] fhandler_proc.cc(format_proc_cpuinfo): fix issues, add fields, flags

2019-10-05 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2019-10-05 15:06, Ken Brown wrote: > On 10/4/2019 6:44 AM, Brian Inglis wrote: >> fix cache size return code handling and make AMD/Intel code common; >> fix cpuid level count as number of non-zero leafs excluding sub-leafs; >> fix AMD physical cores count to be documented nc + 1; >> round cpu

Re: [PATCH] fhandler_proc.cc(format_proc_cpuinfo): fix issues, add fields, flags

2019-10-05 Thread Ken Brown
Hi Brian, On 10/4/2019 6:44 AM, Brian Inglis wrote: > fix cache size return code handling and make AMD/Intel code common; > fix cpuid level count as number of non-zero leafs excluding sub-leafs; > fix AMD physical cores count to be documented nc + 1; > round cpu MHz to correct Windows and match

Re: [PATCH] fhandler_proc.cc(format_proc_cpuinfo): fix issues, add fields, flags

2019-10-05 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2019-10-05 00:30, ASSI wrote: > Brian Inglis writes: >> For informal comparison, attached are Cygwin, WSL, and test release cpuinfo >> output, with diffs against the test release output, and the Windows registry >> CentralProcessor dump (be careful not to double click on Windows systems!) > The

Re: [PATCH] fhandler_proc.cc(format_proc_cpuinfo): fix issues, add fields, flags

2019-10-05 Thread ASSI
Brian Inglis writes: > For informal comparison, attached are Cygwin, WSL, and test release cpuinfo > output, with diffs against the test release output, and the Windows registry > CentralProcessor dump (be careful not to double click on Windows > systems!) The easiest way to prevent that problem