On 2020-07-20 15:08, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> On 7/20/2020 4:29 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2020-07-20 09:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> Ultimately, I wonder if we really should keep all the 32 bit OS stuff
>>> in. The number of real 32 bit systems (not WOW64) is dwindling fast.
Hi Corinna,
On 7/20/2020 2:55 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
From: Corinna Vinschen
It's working on 32 bit OSes only anyway. It even fails on WOW64.
Signed-off-by: Corinna Vinschen
---
Notes:
Hi Ken,
can you please review this patch and check if it doesn't break
your
On 7/20/2020 4:29 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2020-07-20 09:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Ultimately, I wonder if we really should keep all the 32 bit OS stuff
in. The number of real 32 bit systems (not WOW64) is dwindling fast.
Keeping all the AT_ROUND_TO_PAGE stuff in just for what? 2%? of the
On 2020-07-20 09:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Ultimately, I wonder if we really should keep all the 32 bit OS stuff
> in. The number of real 32 bit systems (not WOW64) is dwindling fast.
> Keeping all the AT_ROUND_TO_PAGE stuff in just for what? 2%? of the
> systems is really not worth it, I
From: Corinna Vinschen
It's working on 32 bit OSes only anyway. It even fails on WOW64.
Signed-off-by: Corinna Vinschen
---
Notes:
Hi Ken,
can you please review this patch and check if it doesn't break
your testcase again?
Thanks,
Corinna
winsup/cygwin/mmap.cc
On 7/20/2020 11:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 20 10:58, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
On 7/20/2020 10:49 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
On 7/20/2020 10:43 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
On 7/20/2020 10:23 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 20 09:34, Ken Brown
On Jul 20 10:58, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> On 7/20/2020 10:49 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > On 7/20/2020 10:43 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > On 7/20/2020 10:23 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > On Jul 20 09:34, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > >
On 7/20/2020 10:49 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
On 7/20/2020 10:43 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
On 7/20/2020 10:23 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 20 09:34, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
Commit 605bdcd410384dda6db66b9b8cd19e863702e1bb enabled mapping beyond
EOF
On 7/20/2020 10:43 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
On 7/20/2020 10:23 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 20 09:34, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
Commit 605bdcd410384dda6db66b9b8cd19e863702e1bb enabled mapping beyond
EOF in 64 bit environments. But the variable 'orig_len' did not
On 7/20/2020 10:23 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 20 09:34, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
Commit 605bdcd410384dda6db66b9b8cd19e863702e1bb enabled mapping beyond
EOF in 64 bit environments. But the variable 'orig_len' did not get
rounded up to a multiple of 64K. This rounding was
On Jul 20 09:34, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> Commit 605bdcd410384dda6db66b9b8cd19e863702e1bb enabled mapping beyond
> EOF in 64 bit environments. But the variable 'orig_len' did not get
> rounded up to a multiple of 64K. This rounding was done on 32 bit
> only. Fix this by rounding up
Commit 605bdcd410384dda6db66b9b8cd19e863702e1bb enabled mapping beyond
EOF in 64 bit environments. But the variable 'orig_len' did not get
rounded up to a multiple of 64K. This rounding was done on 32 bit
only. Fix this by rounding up orig_len on 64 bit, in the same place
where 'len' is rounded
On Jul 18 16:00, Jon Turney wrote:
> Use the (undocumented) MEMORY_WORKING_SET_EX_INFORMATION in dumper to
> determine if a MEM_IMAGE region is unsharable, and hence has been
> modified.
Great!
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
On Jul 18 13:48, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> - After commit 0365031ce1347600d854a23f30f1355745a1765c, key input
> becomes not working by following steps.
>1) Start cmd.exe in mintty.
>2) Open another mintty.
>3) Execute "echo AAA > /dev/pty*" (pty* is the pty opened in
14 matches
Mail list logo