Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: pipe: Give up to use query_hdl for non-cygwin apps.

On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 18:38:07 +0100 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 4 16:45, ASSI wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > Right you are. We always said that independent Cygwin installations > > > are supposed to *stay* independent. > > > > > > Keep in mind that they don't share the same shared

Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: pipe: Give up to use query_hdl for non-cygwin apps.

On Mar 4 16:45, ASSI wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > Right you are. We always said that independent Cygwin installations > > are supposed to *stay* independent. > > > > Keep in mind that they don't share the same shared objects in the native > > NT namespace and they don't know of each

Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: pipe: Give up to use query_hdl for non-cygwin apps.

Corinna Vinschen writes: > Right you are. We always said that independent Cygwin installations > are supposed to *stay* independent. > > Keep in mind that they don't share the same shared objects in the native > NT namespace and they don't know of each other. It's not only the > process table

[PATCH] Cygwin: console: Fix a race issue between close() and open().

The open() call for console sometimes fails if the console owner process is closing the console by close() at the same time. This is due to mismatch state of con.owner variable and attaching state to the console. With this patch, checking con.owner and attaching to con.owner sequence in open(),

Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: pipe: Give up to use query_hdl for non-cygwin apps.

On Mar 3 20:36, Takashi Yano wrote: > On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:39:40 +0100 > ASSI wrote: > > Takashi Yano writes: > > >> After noticing that we enumerate all the processes (which is an expensive > > >> operation) just to skip all of the non-Cygwin ones anyway, I wonder if it > > >> wouldn't be