On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Thanks for the patch but I'd prefer keeping the current functionality which
> makes the use of LoadDllprime optional.
I didn't know better :(
> I've checked in a fix for this so that only one .*_info block is loaded
> for any given DLL.
Very nic
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:42:46PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>I've been looking at the contents of the cygwin1.dll image in the last
>few days and I've noticed that the sections named .dllname_info contain
>a lot of duplicate entries - one for each autoloaded function from a given
>dll. Although i
Hello,
I've been looking at the contents of the cygwin1.dll image in the last
few days and I've noticed that the sections named .dllname_info contain
a lot of duplicate entries - one for each autoloaded function from a given
dll. Although it doesn't hurt to have it, this information is not really
