On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 02:42:49 +
"Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]" wrote:
> Can't help but notice that these two lines are not exactly logically
> equivalent:
> format_process_ctty (void *data, char *&destbuf)
> {
>_pinfo *p = (_pinfo *) data;
> - if (p->ctty < 0)
> + if (!CTTY_IS_V
This patch replaces ctty constants with more descriptive macros
(CTTY_UNINITIALIZED and CTTY_RELEASED) rather than -1 and -2 as
well as checking sign with CTTY_IS_VALID().
Fixes: 3b7df69aaa57 (Cygwin: ctty: Add comments for the special values: -1 and
-2.)
Suggested-by: Corinna Vinschen
Signed-of
