[PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log

2002-01-28 Thread Michael A Chase
The current setup.exe source has quite a number of messages that announce method calls. Most are being sent to setup.log and add bulk to that file without providing diagnostic benefit. I have changed the log() calls to send the messages to setup.log.full only. I also shortened the messages in

Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log

2002-01-28 Thread Michael A Chase
- Original Message - From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 20:25 Subject: Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log - Original Message - From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January

Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log

2002-01-28 Thread Michael A Chase
- Original Message - From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael A Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 21:38 Subject: Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log - Original Message - From: Michael A Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log

2002-01-28 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: Michael A Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] Essentially, yes thats why they are there: incomplete methods. When I review your patch I'll be looking at the function status. There's no sense spending your time on the patch. I need to change it drastically or

Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log

2002-01-28 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. If a method only returns a constant 0, the message should go to setup.log.full to make it easier to tell where more work may be needed. Yes, LOG_TIMESTAMP (so that a casual inspection will have it visible).

RE: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log

2002-01-28 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Collins Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:05 AM To: Michael A Chase; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log Ok, I've looked at the patch. Most of the methods

Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log

2002-01-28 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a quick-and-dirtyish String class. Sigh, still no STL. Rob, would you care to just graft more functionality onto my embryonic cistring class? Or was that the plan? I left it to the side for now, but yes I

[PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log (Revision 1)

2002-01-28 Thread Michael A Chase
I think this covers the changes we discussed. -- Mac :}) ** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. ** Ask Smarter: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.htm Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day. Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.