On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 12:45:46PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:30:24PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
2002-12-02 Egor Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
*
given that winsup/cygwin/lib/getopt.c(*) still retains its BSD licensing
and comments, there's no reason to change the (non-)license/public
domain attribution in egor's pseudo-relocs.c file. Egor's patch #4
should be able to be committed as-is.
--Chuck
I'm missing something. What does
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 07:38:23PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
So far, no problems. I'm gonna go on record in favor of this patch, in
its 4th incarnation
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00222.html).
given that winsup/cygwin/lib/getopt.c(*) still retains its BSD licensing
and
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CW OTOH, if you, Egor Duda, do NOT assign ownership to Red Hat, but instead
CW release the code as public domain FIRST, then mingw is free to take it.
That's what i was meaning.
CW Also, Red Hat is free to take it as well
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:30:24PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
2002-12-02 Egor Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
* cygwin/cygwin.sc: Add symbols to handle runtime pseudo-relocs.
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed 2002-12-02 Egor Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to the public domain, so that mingw folks can
also use it.
Egor.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 5165414
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed 2002-12-02 Egor Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to the public domain, so that mingw folks can
also use it.
Is it usable without Cygwin?
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB egor duda wrote:
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed 2002-12-02 Egor Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to the public domain,
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB egor duda wrote:
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed 2002-12-02 Egor Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed
Two issues: (1) the licensing problem, (2) the advisability of mingw
pseudo-reloc. Item (1) here, item (2) in a separate message.
CF I'm not sure that public domain is going to work with the cygwin
license.
ED IANAL, but i can't see why not.
Here's why: in order for code to be incorporated
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:30:24PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
2002-12-02 Egor Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
* cygwin/cygwin.sc: Add symbols to handle runtime pseudo-relocs.
* cygwin/lib/_cygwin_crt0_common.cc: Perform pseudo-relocs during
ed Question: How can one distinguish console application from GUI one?
ed What is the best wording for the error message?
Here's an example. If GetConsoleWindow is available (W2K or XP) it uses
that; otherwise, it uses a different kludge.
The idea is you'd call has_console() or
12 matches
Mail list logo
