Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:46:38PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:20:44PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >Also, should this script be in /usr/sbin instead? > > Logically maybe, but from the standpoint of the cygwin community trying > to use it, I don't know. /usr

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:20:44PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:40:58PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> >Close enough. >> >So, are we jump-starting the car, or replacing the battery? ;-) >> >> I'm just hoping for

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:40:58PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >Close enough. > >So, are we jump-starting the car, or replacing the battery? ;-) > > I'm just hoping for someone to come up with a creative name for > the car. > > cgf "cygferrar

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:40:58PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >Close enough. >So, are we jump-starting the car, or replacing the battery? ;-) I'm just hoping for someone to come up with a creative name for the car. cgf

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:49:44AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:29:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >> >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >

Re: setmetamode

2003-09-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:07:34PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:47:31PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 09:39:53AM +0900, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote: > >> >>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:10:54 +0200 > >> >>> Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:49:44AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:29:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:39AM -0400, Igor Pec

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:29:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:39AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >> >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:29:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:39AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> Wouldn't it be sufficient to add $(srcdir)/cygprogctl to

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:39AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> Wouldn't it be sufficient to add $(srcdir)/cygprogctl to PROGS and to > >> drop the copy rule? The script only needs installing

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:39AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> Wouldn't it be sufficient to add $(srcdir)/cygprogctl to PROGS and to >> drop the copy rule? The script only needs installing and that should >> work then. > >I just remembered why I

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 12:42:50PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > The only thing I didn't test were the rules in the Makefile, > > so if someone could please double-check them, it'd be great. > > > Index: winsup/utils/Makefile.in > >

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 02:16:09PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 12:42:50PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> The only thing I didn't test were the rules in the Makefile, >> so if someone could please double-check them, it'd be great. > >> Index: winsup/utils/Makefile.in

Re: New program: cygtweak

2003-09-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 12:42:50PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > The only thing I didn't test were the rules in the Makefile, > so if someone could please double-check them, it'd be great. > Index: winsup/utils/Makefile.in > ===