This fixes gnuchess on Win95.
There is still a compiler warning, will look at it tonight.
Tested on ME, 95 and NT4.0
Pierre
2004-03-22 Pierre Humblet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* init.cc (munge_threadfunc): Handle all instances of search_for.
(prime_threads): Test
On Mar 21 22:55, Gerd Spalink wrote:
There were no comments about the test program I sent. Do you want to
put it or something like it into the repository?
I used your test application after applying the patch locally.
Some of the tests don't emit a sound, is that correct?
$ ./devdsp
Set
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:36:36AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This fixes gnuchess on Win95.
There is still a compiler warning, will look at it tonight.
Tested on ME, 95 and NT4.0
2004-03-22 Pierre Humblet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* init.cc (munge_threadfunc): Handle all instances of
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:36:36AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This fixes gnuchess on Win95.
There is still a compiler warning, will look at it tonight.
Tested on ME, 95 and NT4.0
2004-03-22 Pierre Humblet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* init.cc
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 02:57:36PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:36:36AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This fixes gnuchess on Win95.
There is still a compiler warning, will look at it tonight.
Tested on ME, 95 and NT4.0
2004-03-22
Can you believe that the address appears 5 times on the stack on Win95,
twice on ME, once on NT4.0?
Now that the method is stable (after 1.5.10 is released), couldn't we
store
the offsets in wincap, keeping the adaptive method as a backup in the
unknown case? Or are there many variations?
I
Please find my answers inserted below.
On Monday, March 22, 2004 6:06 PM, Corinna Vinschen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 21 22:55, Gerd Spalink wrote:
There were no comments about the test program I sent. Do you want to
put it or something like it into the repository?
I used your
At 03:20 PM 3/22/2004 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 02:57:36PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
It works on NT4.0. Will test on 95 and ME this evening.
Fine on ME. There has already been a more complete Win95 test
reported on the list, so I will pass.
The for loop had
