On Jan 5 19:50, Jon TURNEY wrote:
Currently, for cygcheck -s implies -d. This seems rather unhelpful.
I'm afraid I've lost the thread which inspired this, but in it the reporter
provided cygcheck -svr output as requested, but this did not help diagnose
what ultimately turned out to be
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 5 19:50, Jon TURNEY wrote:
Currently, for cygcheck -s implies -d. This seems rather unhelpful.
I'm afraid I've lost the thread which inspired this, but in it the reporter
provided cygcheck -svr output as requested,
