Hi Yaakov,
On Jul 19 20:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
This patchset implements the POSIX clock_nanosleep(2) function:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/clock_nanosleep.html
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/clock_nanosleep.2.html
In summary,
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 09:56 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
This doesn't look right. In contrast to nanosleep, clock_nanosleep
is not subsumed under the _POSIX_TIMERS option. In fact it's the only
function under the _POSIX_CLOCK_SELECTION option.
I did some searching, and there are actually
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 04:16 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 09:56 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
This doesn't look right. In contrast to nanosleep, clock_nanosleep
is not subsumed under the _POSIX_TIMERS option. In fact it's the only
function under the
On Jul 20 04:50, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 04:16 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 09:56 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
This doesn't look right. In contrast to nanosleep, clock_nanosleep
is not subsumed under the _POSIX_TIMERS option. In fact
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:56:54AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I haven't much time right now. If cgf doesn't beat me to it, I'll
review the function later.
I have a couple of PriA problems to look into at work so I don't have
much time either.
cgf
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 16:11 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 20 04:50, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Actually, no need to panic, I took a closer look at this, and it's not
all that hard at all, so I'll go ahead and implement
pthread_condattr_[gs]etclock() as well. Just give me a day or two
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 17:03 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 16:11 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The only problem I see is the fact that a call to clock_settime
influences calls to clock_nanosleep with absolute timeouts(*).
However, clock_settime() can set only
