Hi Yaakov,
anything new from the clock_nanosleep frontier?
On Jul 21 13:51, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 12:37 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Given our current discussion to change cancelable_wait, does it make
sense to review this patch?
No, the cancelable_wait
On Jul 30 17:04, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:41:10PM +0900, jojelino wrote:
As sigproc_init is called during dll initialization, wait_sig thread is
not created as soon as possible.(this is known in msdn createthread
reference.
On 2011-07-31 PM 5:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Erm, I tested on 32 bit. The slowdown occured on all platforms, not
only 64 bit. 64 bit is still only half as fast in the date loop for
reason or reasons unknown.
Corinna
I used this code to profile every source compiled with -pg
On 2011-07-31 PM 6:16, jojelino wrote:
# in i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/cygwin/Makefile, you should add CFLAGS '-pg
-finstrument-functions' , to make new profiling code effective.
and comment out ifneq ${filter -O%,$(CFLAGS)} too. it would make
profiling code functional ( in cases you need to
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 06:16:56PM +0900, jojelino wrote:
On 2011-07-31 PM 5:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Erm, I tested on 32 bit. The slowdown occured on all platforms, not
only 64 bit. 64 bit is still only half as fast in the date loop for
reason or reasons unknown.
Corinna
I used this
