Re: [PATCH RFC] fork: reduce chances for "address space is already occupied" errors

2019-04-08 Thread Achim Gratz
Michael Haubenwallner writes: > Well... once installed, a dll may get in use quickly, because I can not > require > to shut down all Cygwin processes. So I need to rebase and register the dll > in > some staging directory before it is installed into it's final directory, hence > I'm about to

Re: [PATCH RFC] fork: reduce chances for "address space is already occupied" errors

2019-04-08 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2019-04-08 06:38, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > On 4/3/19 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Apr 3 12:38, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >>> Furthermore, with so called "Stacked Prefix", it is possible to have a >>> second >>> level of Gentoo Prefix, so what I'm after is some option to

Re: [PATCH RFC] fork: reduce chances for "address space is already occupied" errors

2019-04-08 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 4/3/19 2:28 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Michael Haubenwallner writes: >> Before I really can tell what I need regarding the rebase, I need to learn >> what >> exactly is recorded into the rebase database, and probably how the recorded >> data >> does influence the rebase procedure right now. >

Re: [PATCH RFC] fork: reduce chances for "address space is already occupied" errors

2019-04-08 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 4/3/19 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 3 12:38, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >> Furthermore, with so called "Stacked Prefix", it is possible to have a second >> level of Gentoo Prefix, so what I'm after is some option to tell the rebase >> utility which database to record dll base