On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:27 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 30 03:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:13 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 29 19:32, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
This patch adds the fourth component of Linux's /proc/loadavg[1], the
current
On Apr 1 02:21, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:27 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 30 03:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:13 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 29 19:32, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
This patch adds the fourth component of
On Mar 29 19:32, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
This patch adds the fourth component of Linux's /proc/loadavg[1], the
current running/total processes count. My only question is if states
other than 'O' and 'R' should be considered running for this purpose.
That looks right. But I don't see that
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:13 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 29 19:32, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
This patch adds the fourth component of Linux's /proc/loadavg[1], the
current running/total processes count. My only question is if states
other than 'O' and 'R' should be considered
On Mar 30 03:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:13 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 29 19:32, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
This patch adds the fourth component of Linux's /proc/loadavg[1], the
current running/total processes count. My only question is if states
This patch adds the fourth component of Linux's /proc/loadavg[1], the
current running/total processes count. My only question is if states
other than 'O' and 'R' should be considered running for this purpose.
Patches for winsup/cygwin and winsup/doc attached.
Yaakov
[1]
