On Feb 10 15:15, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 10 21:47, jojelino wrote:
On 2011-02-10 19:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Also, it would be nice if you would add more words to explain what your
patch is doing. Just a patch with no explanation is not very inviting
to take a look at it at
i am sorry for extra line feed. corrected.
requesting review.
Index: winsup/cygwin/dcrt0.cc
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/winsup/cygwin/dcrt0.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.390
diff -u -r1.390 dcrt0.cc
--- winsup/cygwin/dcrt0.cc 26 Dec
On Feb 10 23:56, jojelino wrote:
i am sorry for extra line feed. corrected.
requesting review.
Thanks, will do. Would you mind to give us your real name for the
ChangeLog entry?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
On 2011-02-11 AM 12:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 10 23:56, jojelino wrote:
i am sorry for extra line feed. corrected.
requesting review.
Thanks, will do. Would you mind to give us your real name for the
ChangeLog entry?
Corinna
Jin-woo Ye.thank you
On Feb 10 10:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:15:15PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Ok, I have just a problem. Your patch doesn't apply because your
mail client appears to insert line breaks if the lines get too long.
Please send the patch again without the line
On 2011-02-11 AM 12:32, Christopher Faylor wrote:
-void __stdcall
+void __stdcall __attribute__ ((regparm (1), noreturn))
do_exit (int status)
{
no. it doesn't fix sigsegv, but for compilation error in 4.6.
to summerize, all changes of function definition fixes compilation error
in gcc
