On Apr 3 16:54, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 23:33 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 1 14:57, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
For the sake of clarity, I would reorder it a bit further to
make FH_PROC and friends to one side of major-0 and everything else to
the other
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 23:33 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 1 14:57, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
For the sake of clarity, I would reorder it a bit further to
make FH_PROC and friends to one side of major-0 and everything else to
the other side:
/* begin /proc directories */
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:05:56PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Chris, do you think there's anything speaking against rearranging this
so that the FH_FS and FH_NETDRIVE definitions are separate from the
stuff under /proc? Or, hang on, we should change all PROC values,
along these lines:
On Apr 1 11:34, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:05:56PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Chris, do you think there's anything speaking against rearranging this
so that the FH_FS and FH_NETDRIVE definitions are separate from the
stuff under /proc? Or, hang on, we should
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:05 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The definition of isproc_dev starts to get on my nerves. We have to
check for six distinct values now. I think we should really change
the definition. Here's what we have in devices.h right now:
FH_PROC= FHDEV (0, 250),
