Re: Signal handler not executed

2007-08-13 Thread Peter Rehley
On Aug 9, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:09:48PM -0400, Ernie Coskrey wrote: There's a very small window of vulnerability in _sigbe, which can lead to signal handlers not being executed. In _sigbe, the _cygtls lock is released before incyg is

Re: Signal handler not executed

2007-08-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 12:25:49PM -0700, Peter Rehley wrote: On Aug 9, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:09:48PM -0400, Ernie Coskrey wrote: There's a very small window of vulnerability in _sigbe, which can lead to signal handlers not being executed. In

Re: Signal handler not executed

2007-08-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:09:48PM -0400, Ernie Coskrey wrote: There's a very small window of vulnerability in _sigbe, which can lead to signal handlers not being executed. In _sigbe, the _cygtls lock is released before incyg is decremented. If setup_handler acquires the lock just after _sigbe

RE: Signal handler not executed

2007-08-09 Thread Ernie Coskrey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 1:19 PM To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Signal handler not executed On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:09:48PM -0400, Ernie Coskrey wrote

RE: Signal handler not executed

2007-08-09 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Ernie Coskrey wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 1:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR. Thanks. Subject: Re: Signal