On 18/07/2023 13:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 18 12:20, Jon Turney wrote:
On 17/07/2023 16:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Looking into pthread::cancel we have this order of things:
// cancel deferred
mutex.unlock ();
canceled = true;
SetEvent (cancel_event);
On Jul 18 14:37, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 15:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > > We can't neatly tuck the pthread_cleanup_push/pop inside the object, as
> > > they are implemented as macros which must appear in the same lexical
> > > scope.
> >
> > You could do it if you call the
On 17/07/2023 15:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We can't neatly tuck the pthread_cleanup_push/pop inside the object, as
they are implemented as macros which must appear in the same lexical
scope.
You could do it if you call the underlying functions instead.
pthread_cleanup_push is just a
On Jul 18 12:20, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 16:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Looking into pthread::cancel we have this order of things:
> > >
> > > // cancel deferred
> > > mutex.unlock ();
> > > canceled = true;
> > > SetEvent (cancel_event);
> > > return 0;
>
On 17/07/2023 16:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 17 16:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 17 12:51, Jon Turney wrote:
On 17/07/2023 12:05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc b/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
index f614e01c42f6..fceb9bda1806 100644
---
