> of course, I announced a binary with this patch about one month ago and
> got no negative response. (Actually I got no response, but the binary was
> downloaded about 30 times in that month)
>
> bye
> ago
The code looks fine to me, but, I don't want the patch committed until some
effort is
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Thanks for the patch. Is there any chance of bouncing this off the
> cygwin-xfree list first to get some feedback before we commit ?
>
of course, I announced a binary with this patch about one month ago and
got no negative res
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 08:45:43AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > I'm pulling the xf-4_2-branch tree right now. I might build a distribution
> > within a couple days.
> >
> I'll do it today and get it up on ftp.xfree86.org. If anyone else can
> pull it across to the cygwin machine that'd be go
Title: QuickNotes by CloudEight Stationery--"Butterfly-Brown
±zªº²£«~»Ýn¦ÛÖߥ]¸Ë³U
P: ¶Q¤½¥q
±ÄÁʳ¡ OPP, PP ¦UºØ¦ÛÖߥ]¸Ë³U
¦Q¥d³U
¶W§C»ù¦^õX: 5.8*16.5/16.5cm
¥¤f³U 0.05¤¸/pc
5.7*19/23cm ¦L1¦â¦Q¥d³U
0.15¤¸/pc 8.2*12/16 cm
ªÅ¥Õ¦ÛÖß³U 0.09¤¸/pc
×ð¾´µÄÐÂÀÏ¿Í»§£ºÄúºÃ!
ÎÒÃǹ«Ë¾µÄÆóÒµÓÊÏä½üÆÚÒÑÉý¼¶µ½Imail 7.04°æ±¾£¬²¢¼ÓÁËSMTPÉí·ÝÑéÖ¤£¬
ÇëÄúÔÚÄúµÄÓʼþÊÕ·¢¹¤¾ßÖÐÉèÖÃSMTPµÄÉí·ÝÑé֤Ϊ"ÓëPOP3ͬÑùµÄÉèÖÃ"¡£ÈçÄúÔÚ
ʹÓÃÖз¢ÏÖÓÐÈκβ»±ãÇëºÍÎÒÃÇÁªÏµ£¬Êý×ÖÒýÇ潫ÒÔ×î¿ìµÄËٶȸøÄú½â¾öÎÊÌâ¡£
ͬʱ,ÎÒÃǽ«Ò»Èç¼ÌÍù¸øÄúÌṩ×îÓÅÖʵķþÎñºÍ×îÓŻݵļ۸ñ
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> XFree86-100dpi-fonts
> XFree86
> XFree86-75dpi-fonts
> XFree86-cyrillic-fonts
> XFree86-devel
> XFree86-doc
> XFree86-glide-module
> XFree86-libs
> XFree86-server
> XFree86-static-libs
> XFree86-xfs
> XFree86-Xnest
> XFree86-Xvfb
looks good to me
> Bu
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 08:04:45PM -0500, Harold Hunt wrote:
> > XFree86 4.2.0 has been tagged and the binaries are showing up on
> > ftp.xfree86.org now.
> >
> > Are we bothering with a distribution as per the normal XFree86 approach?
> > or is anyone working on distributing XFree86 4.2.0 via the
